2013
DOI: 10.3390/rs6010233
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Actual Evapotranspiration (Water Use) Assessment of the Colorado River Basin at the Landsat Resolution Using the Operational Simplified Surface Energy Balance Model

Abstract: Accurately estimating consumptive water use in the Colorado River Basin (CRB) is important for assessing and managing limited water resources in the basin. Increasing water demand from various sectors may threaten long-term sustainability of the water supply in the arid southwestern United States. We have developed a first-ever basin-wide actual evapotranspiration (ET a ) map of the CRB at the Landsat scale for water use assessment at the field level. We used the operational Simplified Surface Energy Balance (… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
45
2
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 64 publications
(49 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
1
45
2
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This eliminates the need for the selection of cold and hot pixels from each Landsat scene as required in the METRIC processing. Several of these less input-intensive models utilizing Landsat data have been tested in agriculture and other simpler land cover types [52][53][54]. Given the limited availability of meteorological data in the Amazon and challenges identifying suitable cold and hot pixels in Amazonian conditions, these alternative models, due to their simplicity, may have a use in the Amazon for applications where a potentially larger margin of error in the ET estimates can be tolerated.…”
Section: Challenges In Application Of Metric For Forest Et Estimationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This eliminates the need for the selection of cold and hot pixels from each Landsat scene as required in the METRIC processing. Several of these less input-intensive models utilizing Landsat data have been tested in agriculture and other simpler land cover types [52][53][54]. Given the limited availability of meteorological data in the Amazon and challenges identifying suitable cold and hot pixels in Amazonian conditions, these alternative models, due to their simplicity, may have a use in the Amazon for applications where a potentially larger margin of error in the ET estimates can be tolerated.…”
Section: Challenges In Application Of Metric For Forest Et Estimationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, hourly based meteorological data is not required for SSEBop [52] which also employs a pre-defined hot and cold boundary condition for computing daily ET. This eliminates the need for the selection of cold and hot pixels from each Landsat scene as required in the METRIC processing.…”
Section: Challenges In Application Of Metric For Forest Et Estimationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We used Landsat satellite images (path 28, row 31) acquired on 4 July, 5 August, 24 October, and 11 December (Landsat 5, Thematic Mapper: TM) and four images acquired on 13 August, 29 August, 30 September, and 16 October (Landsat 7, Enhanced Thematic Mapper Plus: ETM+) during the 2001 crop growing season (Figure 1). The Landsat images were processed using Erdas Imagine software (Hexagon Geospatial Inc., Norcross, GA, USA) based on standard procedure where digital number values are first converted to radiance and then to reflectance [20]. The University of Nebraska Agricultural Research and Development Center (ARDC) near Mead, Nebraska, within the Landsat scene footprint has three eddy covariance (EC) measurements sites.…”
Section: Study Areamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Landsat images were processed using Erdas Imagine software (Hexagon Geospatial Inc., Norcross, GA, USA) based on standard procedure where digital number values are first converted to radiance and then to reflectance [20]. The University of Nebraska Agricultural Research and Development Center (ARDC) near Mead, Nebraska, within the Landsat scene footprint has three eddy covariance (EC) measurements sites.…”
Section: Study Areamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Computation of annual ET from MOD-SMET involves linear interpolation, where ET values for unavailable dates (due to error in the remote sensor or cloud-contaminated images) are linearly interpolated between two image acquisition dates. This method is generally suitable when remotely sensed images are available at regular intervals and each image captures the overall pattern of variation in ET [94]. For more information regarding interpolation between clear sky days, please refer to Singh et al [94].…”
Section: Annual Total Actual Evapotranspiration Estimatesmentioning
confidence: 99%