1992
DOI: 10.1007/bf00055606
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Acute and chronic effects of lisinopril on renal and systemic hemodynamics in hypertension

Abstract: Acute and chronic effects of the converting enzyme inhibitor lisinopril on renal and systemic hemodynamics were studied in 12 patients with mild to moderate essential hypertension. After a washout period, cardiac output (measured by Doppler echography), renal plasma flow, and glomerular filtration rate (measured by isotopic techniques) were determined before and after oral administration of 20 mg lisinopril (visit 1). The same protocol was repeated after 3 months of lisinopril therapy 20 mg once daily (visit 2… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

1995
1995
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Though clearly sufficient to permit reasonably firm conclusions about common renal mechanisms of action of antihypertensive drugs, studies in humans of the renal hemodynamic effects over extended periods would benefit from being more rigorous and numerous. Many have been motivated by an attempt to display “favorable” renal effects, by which is usually meant no reduction in GFR or RBF (Textor et al, 1982 ; Bauer, 1984 ; Sugino et al, 1984 ; Dupont et al, 1987 ; Smith et al, 1987 ; Reams et al, 1988 ; Degaute et al, 1992 ; De Rosa et al, 2002 ), when it is clear that neither of these is a prerequisite for clinical efficacy. Furthermore, some studies misleadingly identify a fall in RVR as contributing to an antihypertensive effect only in proportion to the contribution this fall makes to the decrease in overall SVR (Koshy et al, 1977 ; Preston et al, 1979 ; Warren et al, 1981 ; Thananopavarn et al, 1982 ; Bauer, 1984 ; Dupont et al, 1987 ; Smith et al, 1987 ; van den Meiracker et al, 1989 ; Fridman et al, 2000 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Though clearly sufficient to permit reasonably firm conclusions about common renal mechanisms of action of antihypertensive drugs, studies in humans of the renal hemodynamic effects over extended periods would benefit from being more rigorous and numerous. Many have been motivated by an attempt to display “favorable” renal effects, by which is usually meant no reduction in GFR or RBF (Textor et al, 1982 ; Bauer, 1984 ; Sugino et al, 1984 ; Dupont et al, 1987 ; Smith et al, 1987 ; Reams et al, 1988 ; Degaute et al, 1992 ; De Rosa et al, 2002 ), when it is clear that neither of these is a prerequisite for clinical efficacy. Furthermore, some studies misleadingly identify a fall in RVR as contributing to an antihypertensive effect only in proportion to the contribution this fall makes to the decrease in overall SVR (Koshy et al, 1977 ; Preston et al, 1979 ; Warren et al, 1981 ; Thananopavarn et al, 1982 ; Bauer, 1984 ; Dupont et al, 1987 ; Smith et al, 1987 ; van den Meiracker et al, 1989 ; Fridman et al, 2000 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…ACE-I are the primary antihypertensive drugs with the most nephroprotective properties. Degaute et al [ 20 ] showed a significant decrease in RVR in patients chronically treated with lisinopril. Moreover, based on the example of 20 patients treated for eight weeks with enalapril, De Cesaris et al [ 21 ] found a significant increase in effective renal plasma flow and a decrease in RVR.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%