2009
DOI: 10.1097/ccm.0b013e318194ac44
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Acute left ventricular dilatation and shock-induced myocardial dysfunction*

Abstract: Acute and reversible left ventricular dilation accompanies septic shock-induced systolic left ventricular dysfunction. When septic myocardial abnormalities are limited to reversible impairment of left ventricular relaxation, left ventricular dimensions remain unchanged.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
86
2
11

Year Published

2012
2012
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 147 publications
(105 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
6
86
2
11
Order By: Relevance
“…Echocardiographic studies have reported similar results with a reduced global systolic function in 30 to 60% of septic shock patients (23,35) and reversibility in survivors (26,28,102). The definition of systolic dysfunction has varied (LVEF 45 to 55%) and comparison between studies is therefore complicated.…”
Section: Echocardiographysupporting
confidence: 57%
“…Echocardiographic studies have reported similar results with a reduced global systolic function in 30 to 60% of septic shock patients (23,35) and reversibility in survivors (26,28,102). The definition of systolic dysfunction has varied (LVEF 45 to 55%) and comparison between studies is therefore complicated.…”
Section: Echocardiographysupporting
confidence: 57%
“…Despite the obvious importance of these echocardiographic findings, the presence of any myocardial dysfunction was not associated with increased mortality at 30 days or 1 year. 28,29 suggesting that LV diameters and volumes could be better markers of prognosis than LVEF. Arguably, this difference could be secondary to dis- crepancies in resuscitation and loading conditions; patients having less aggressive fluid resuscitation could demonstrate lower ventricular volumes, which could translate to poorer prognosis.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…16,20 We found a higher hs-cTnT level in non-survivors, compared to that of survivors. Furthermore, a previous study found higher hs-cTnT levels in septic vs. non-septic neonates [190 (120-320) pg/mL vs. 30 (0-7) pg/mL, respectively; (P < 0.0001)].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 67%