1992
DOI: 10.1200/jco.1992.10.9.1444
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Acute monocytic or myelomonocytic leukemia with balanced chromosome translocations to band 11q23 after therapy with 4-epi-doxorubicin and cisplatin or cyclophosphamide for breast cancer.

Abstract: 4-epi-doxorubicin is leukemogenic, and the leukemias are often acute monocytic or myelomonocytic with balanced chromosome translocations to band 11q23, such as in the leukemias after therapy with the epipodophyllotoxins. Furthermore, our results suggest a synergistic effect in leukemogenesis between 4-epi-doxorubicin targeting DNA-topoisomerase II and directly genotoxic drugs such as cisplatin or alkylating agents.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
41
0
1

Year Published

1996
1996
2002
2002

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 123 publications
(44 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
2
41
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Such mutations are important since they often appear to confer resistance to further anti-cancer treatment (Lowe et al, 1994;Wada et al, 1994;Aas et al, 1996). Loss or translocation of chromosomal material has been observed in the secondary tumours of human patients treated with epirubicin or the closely related drug doxorubicin (Pedersen-Bjergaard et al, 1992;Ho mann et al, 1995). This type of genetic damage is suggested to result from intercalation of the drug into DNA and inhibition of DNA topoisomerase II activity (Tewey et al, 1984;Bartkowiak et al, 1992).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such mutations are important since they often appear to confer resistance to further anti-cancer treatment (Lowe et al, 1994;Wada et al, 1994;Aas et al, 1996). Loss or translocation of chromosomal material has been observed in the secondary tumours of human patients treated with epirubicin or the closely related drug doxorubicin (Pedersen-Bjergaard et al, 1992;Ho mann et al, 1995). This type of genetic damage is suggested to result from intercalation of the drug into DNA and inhibition of DNA topoisomerase II activity (Tewey et al, 1984;Bartkowiak et al, 1992).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24] More recently, the DNA topoisomerase II inhibitors have also been shown to be leukemogenic, in most instances administered in combination with platinum derivatives or an alkylating agent. [25][26][27][28] These leukemias primarily present balanced translocations to chromosome bands 11q23 or 21q22 29 with rearrangement of the MLL and the AML1 genes, but also less frequently other balanced rearrangements such as the inv (16)(p13q22), and the t(15;17)(q22;q11) known from de novo MDS and AML. 30,31 The whole-arm translocations leading to dicentric chromosomes as observed in t-MDS and t-AML in the present study differ generally from the balanced chromosome aberrations.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This translocation is primarily a de novo, or idiopathic event, by the lack of identified causal exposure in most of the cases. T (8;21) occasionally occurs in leukemias associated with prior exposure to cancer chemotherapy of both alkylator and topoisomerase II inhibitor activity, 8,[25][26][27][28][29] and has also been reported in leukemias associated with certain occupational exposures. [30][31][32][33] AML1 is occasionally fused to other partners in therapy-related leukemias, including EVI-1/MDS/EAP, MTG16, and other partners in chromosomes 1, 12, 14 and others.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%