2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.repce.2021.10.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Acute myocardial infarction on YouTube – is it all fake news?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
3
0
1

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
1
3
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Correlatively to our study, many of the studies stated that YouTube videos can be used for educational purposes(14, 15) however Fialho et al (10) stated that there are some misleading videos and contents should be checked by experts.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 62%
“…Correlatively to our study, many of the studies stated that YouTube videos can be used for educational purposes(14, 15) however Fialho et al (10) stated that there are some misleading videos and contents should be checked by experts.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 62%
“…heart attack, arteriovenous malformations). 18,19 Moving forward, our findings may help in the selection of social media platforms for behavioral or social support interventions for people with heart disease, hypertension, and diabetes. These findings may also shed light on non-clinic-based supports that people use outside of health care settings.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…In this study, we introduced a novel approach by utilizing the GQS, DISCERN score, and VPI as tools to assess the quality, reliability, and popularity of video content from each uploader. Fialho et al conducted a study evaluating 1000 videos, excluding non-Portuguese content, and utilized different quality evaluation systems like the Health on the Net Code in addition to DISCERN scores to determine information accuracy [ 15 ]. A systematic review by Osman et al in 2019 analyzed 202 English-language articles on medical and health-related content and found that 25 studies used the GQS system, with an average score of 2.68 out of 5 for all the videos in the study.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%