2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.crad.2015.12.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Acute myocardial infarction: susceptibility-weighted cardiac MRI for the detection of reperfusion haemorrhage at 1.5 T

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The weighted mean T 2 * values at 1.5 T in myocardial infarction (MI) patients was 28.5 ± 6.8 ms and 34.7 ± 3.7 ms in controls [39][40][41][42][43][44][45][46][47][48][49] (Table 1, Fig. 2).…”
Section: Myocardial Infarctionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The weighted mean T 2 * values at 1.5 T in myocardial infarction (MI) patients was 28.5 ± 6.8 ms and 34.7 ± 3.7 ms in controls [39][40][41][42][43][44][45][46][47][48][49] (Table 1, Fig. 2).…”
Section: Myocardial Infarctionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…4). Most studies performed CMR in ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) patients post percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in the acute phase [39][40][41][42][43][44][46][47][48][49][50][51]. Some studies performed follow-up in these patient groups [42-44, 47, 49, 50] and Mohammadzadeh et al [45] was the only study including non-STEMI (NSTEMI) patients.…”
Section: Myocardial Infarctionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, we did find a difference in the T 1Core and T 2Core between those with early MVO with IMH and early MVO without IMH and this needs to be confirmed in future studies. We did not acquire data on black blood T 2 ‐STIR images or susceptibility‐weighted cardiac MRI (which has been shown to improve the detection of IMH at 1.5 T and 3T for comparison. The reduction in T 1 and T 2 using SSFP readouts could have been due to a combination of both the on‐resonance and off‐resonance signals from the paramagnetic components of the IMH and this was not elucidated in this study.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In our study, we designed different extend MI from 9.5% to 46.9%. This infarction extent was bigger than in former studies [2,7,[9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20]; the range of these studies was not comprehensive to reveal the relationship between IMH and MI. Some areas in our study were smaller than the other study, this suggested that IMH can be found in small MI sizes.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 56%