1981
DOI: 10.1177/036354658100900203
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Acute posterior cruciate ligament injuries

Abstract: One hundred and two posterior cruciate ligament injuries were reviewed (43 chronic and 59 acute repairs). The 59 acute repairs were profiled as to cause and site of injury, associated ligamentous damage, clinical examination, patient position at surgery, and reoperation rate. Twenty-two patients were followed up. Motor vehicle accidents and athletics were the usual causes of injury. In the 59 acute repairs, the posterior cruciate avulsion site was femoral in 21, midsubstance in 13, and tibial in 25. The high i… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
49
0
1

Year Published

2001
2001
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 119 publications
(51 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
1
49
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Although clinical findings such as a posterior tibial sag and provocative physical examination maneuvers such as the posterior drawer and quadriceps-active test are hallmarks of PCL insufficiency, no physical examination maneuvers can differentiate a substance tear from an avulsion injury [6,7,11,14,20,32,34,36]. Therefore, radiographic analysis is critical for proper diagnosis and treatment.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although clinical findings such as a posterior tibial sag and provocative physical examination maneuvers such as the posterior drawer and quadriceps-active test are hallmarks of PCL insufficiency, no physical examination maneuvers can differentiate a substance tear from an avulsion injury [6,7,11,14,20,32,34,36]. Therefore, radiographic analysis is critical for proper diagnosis and treatment.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most reports on PCL injuries are retrospective studies of acute and chronic PCL injuries that include a mixed population of both isolated and combined ligamentous injuries of the knee [5,11,12,[14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28]. Based on these reports, it is difficult to derive a conclusion regarding the ideal management of patients with acute, isolated PCL injuries.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, discriminative validity depends on the fact that measurements that lack a relationship should not be related. For example, the Lachman's test is used to determine anterior cruciate ligament injuries while the posterior drawer test is used to determine posterior cruciate ligament injuries 17 . Therefore, if a subject has an anterior cruciate ligament injury but the posterior cruciate ligament is not injured, the Lachman's test should be positive, but the posterior drawer test should be negative.…”
Section: Discriminate Validitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, the Lachman's test specificity can be analyzed by performing the test in subjects with non-injured anterior cruciate ligament but with injured posterior cruciate ligament. The tests' results would have to be negative because there would be no anterior cruciate ligament injury and the test is supposed to detect injuries to this ligament and not injuries to the posterior cruciate ligament 17 .…”
Section: Specificitymentioning
confidence: 99%