2008
DOI: 10.1136/hrt.2005.071274
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Acute pulmonary embolism revisited

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
10
0
3

Year Published

2009
2009
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
10
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Studies have consistently demonstrated a poorer prognosis associated with right heart strain [5,6], and data from a number of studies have now confirmed an increased risk of mortality in patients with right heart strain evidenced through either biomarkers of cardiac injury (troponin or BNP) [30][31][32][33] or radiological and echocardiogram evidence [5,6,31]. In the cohort of patients without circulatory collapse, it is still not known whether treatment with thrombolysis is warranted; a recent study [34], currently in press, noted that while pulmonary artery obstruction scores can differentiate between patients with and without RV dysfunction, these were not correlated to adverse clinical outcome.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Studies have consistently demonstrated a poorer prognosis associated with right heart strain [5,6], and data from a number of studies have now confirmed an increased risk of mortality in patients with right heart strain evidenced through either biomarkers of cardiac injury (troponin or BNP) [30][31][32][33] or radiological and echocardiogram evidence [5,6,31]. In the cohort of patients without circulatory collapse, it is still not known whether treatment with thrombolysis is warranted; a recent study [34], currently in press, noted that while pulmonary artery obstruction scores can differentiate between patients with and without RV dysfunction, these were not correlated to adverse clinical outcome.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The higher rate of bleeding than expected in the present study could be the result of having more patients with comorbid risks for bleeding and those with a relative contraindication to thrombolysis. Catheter-based treatment is best for patients at risk of bleeding, 22 although it is reported that invasive procedures are an independent factor for major bleeding. 25,30 …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…15 Catheter-based treatment is currently recommended in patients with contraindications to thrombolysis. 22 Pulmonary emboli resolve by natural thrombolytic processes, but a few patients with acute PE progress to residual thrombus with pulmonary hypertension. Persistent RV dysfunction is a predictor of adverse long-term prognosis.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3,19 Its overutilization not only exposes the patient to radiation and contrast kidney disease risk, 21,22 but it is weighed as well by exceeding costs; costs that are enhanced by overtreatment of incidental pulmonary embolism, that should not be treated at all. 8,21 Despite the undoubted advantage of this tool in the diagnostic pathway of thrombosis, its use should be targeted and limited to patients with a high pre-test clinical probability or an elevated Ddimer test. 3,6 Lastly, if lower limbs compression ultrasound, which should precede imaging tests in pregnant women and in patients with a contraindication to CT, 4,[23][24][25] is performed as a first step, CT or scintigraphy could be avoided in about 10% of patients.…”
Section: Score Interpretation Points Prevalencementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Conversely, the threshold that rules out pulmonary embolism, advising against anticoagulant therapy, is a probability pre-test ≤2%. [6][7][8] Two validated scores are widely used: the Wells score 9 and the revised Geneva one 10 (Tables 1 and 2). We refer mainly to the Wells score, validated in inpatients; Geneva score is reserved to outpatients.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%