Summary:The appropriateness of inotropic therapy in chronic heart failure was examined by critically reviewing five assumptions upon which this form oftherapy has been justified. Only the first, that cardiac performance can be acutely improved by inotropic therapy, has been empirically proven. That such acute improvement is sustained appears to be true with non-catecholamine agents whereas the chronic haemodynamic efficacy of oral catecholamines remains in doubt. That any inotropic agent can improve exercise tolerance, make the patient feel better, or effect a change without deleteriously affecting the myocyte is very much in doubt. Thus, although the prospect of using powerful inotropic therapy in the patient with heart failure is theoretically appealing, its utility remains to be proven.With the historical precedent of digitalis, the propriety for using an inotropic agent in chronic heart failure has, by and large, not been seriously questioned. The logic seems clear in directing therapy at the central derangement in most types of heart failure, namely myocardial dysfunction. That a positive inotropic agent can be effective therapy in chronic heart failure has not, however, been proven. The use of such agents is predicated on certain assumptions which may not be correct. These assumptions will be examined in order to consider the possible therapeutic role of inotropic therapy in chronic heart failure.