2023
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2022.119833
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Acute TMS/fMRI response explains offline TMS network effects – An interleaved TMS-fMRI study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

3
15
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 59 publications
3
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Interestingly, three of five measures (Exc_ind, sample entropy and alpha power) showed a larger E/I increase in the regions contralateral to the iTBS target, than in the left M1. This is in line with recent TMS-fMRI findings (Tik et al 2023) and might reflect some compensatory mechanisms.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Interestingly, three of five measures (Exc_ind, sample entropy and alpha power) showed a larger E/I increase in the regions contralateral to the iTBS target, than in the left M1. This is in line with recent TMS-fMRI findings (Tik et al 2023) and might reflect some compensatory mechanisms.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…Secondly, when exploring non-eloquent cortices, concurrent neuroimaging measurements are necessary to measure the response to stimuli. Simultaneous TMS-Electroencephalography (TMS-EEG) (Giambattistelli et al 2014; Tremblay et al 2019), TMS-functional magnetic resonance imaging (TMS-fMRI) (Tik et al 2023; Mizutani-Tiebel et al 2022) and TMS-functional near-infrared spectroscopy (TMS-fNIRS) (Cai et al 2022) are among the most common options (Bergmann et al 2016), but the data acquisition process is long and difficult. Neuroimaging signals are affected by artifacts, and there is uncertainty on the extent to which neuroimaging metrics align with the classical definition of cortical excitability (Cai et al 2022; Conde et al 2019).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Due to the flexibility of our mTMS power electronics and coil design algorithms, we open a possibility for future designs with critical improvements in stimulus focality, which can elucidate better the underlying physiological and anatomical processes on the orientation sensitivity of the rat brain motor representations. This setup can be utilized to create and test a wide range of protocols to study whole-brain and network effects of neuromodulation (Bergmann et al, 2021; Mengotti et al, 2022; Tik et al, 2023; Yang et al, 2021) and treatments for neurological disorders (Dawson et al, 2018; Seewoo et al, 2018; Siddiqi et al, 2022).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…EEG has high temporal resolution but offers limited spatial specificity, especially with rodents, and while PET provides higher spatial specificity than EEG, it requires radioactive tracers, hindering large-population studies. In turn, modern ultra-high-field MRI scanners offer superior spatial resolution compared to PET and EEG, enabling non-invasive network-level investigations of healthy and diseased brains (Bergmann et al, 2021; Gordon et al, 2023; Siebner et al, 2009; Tik et al, 2023).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) has also been used to document the acute impact of TMS on brain networks, 14 which has shown that rTMS‐induced functional changes tend to spread distally across and within networks 15,16 . Recently, a concurrent interleaved TMS/fMRI study was conducted with state‐of‐the‐science purpose‐designed MRI head coils to delineate networks and downstream regions activated by DLPFC‐TMS, and it was found that regions of increased acute signal activation during TMS resemble a resting‐state brain network 17 . These studies provided important progress highlighting the importance of wider network‐level consequences of TMS after site stimulation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%