2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.08.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

AdaPT: An adaptive preterm segmentation algorithm for neonatal brain MRI

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
64
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 74 publications
(64 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
(58 reference statements)
0
64
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Quantitative validation metrics Prastawa et al [78] Dice similarity coefficient, Cohen's kappa coefficient [119] Dice coefficient, false positive, false negative, boundary segmentation error, Surface reconstruction error Song [100] Dice coefficient Weisenfeld and Warfield [115] Dice coefficient [120] Dice coefficient, correct estimation index, over estimation index, under estimation index Shi et al [91,92,93] Dice coefficient [54] Dice coefficient, surface reconstruction error Melbourne et al [64] Dice coefficient Makropoulos et al [59] Dice coefficient, 95th-percentile Hausdorff distance Gui et al [43] Dice coefficient Anbeek et al [5] Dice coefficient, sensitivity, specificity Gousias et al [40] Dice coefficient [33] Dice coefficient, 95th-percentile Hausdorff distance Cardoso et al [17] Dice coefficient Wang et al [108] Dice coefficient, surface distance error, Hausdorff distance Wang et al [109] Dice coefficient, surface distance error, landmark curve distance error, local and global gyrification index Makropoulos et al [60] Dice coefficient works have included both neonatal and older infant/pediatric subjects in their studies; thus, such works also need to be included for the sake of completeness of the review. For instance, the 'LABEL' approach i.e.…”
Section: Authorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Quantitative validation metrics Prastawa et al [78] Dice similarity coefficient, Cohen's kappa coefficient [119] Dice coefficient, false positive, false negative, boundary segmentation error, Surface reconstruction error Song [100] Dice coefficient Weisenfeld and Warfield [115] Dice coefficient [120] Dice coefficient, correct estimation index, over estimation index, under estimation index Shi et al [91,92,93] Dice coefficient [54] Dice coefficient, surface reconstruction error Melbourne et al [64] Dice coefficient Makropoulos et al [59] Dice coefficient, 95th-percentile Hausdorff distance Gui et al [43] Dice coefficient Anbeek et al [5] Dice coefficient, sensitivity, specificity Gousias et al [40] Dice coefficient [33] Dice coefficient, 95th-percentile Hausdorff distance Cardoso et al [17] Dice coefficient Wang et al [108] Dice coefficient, surface distance error, Hausdorff distance Wang et al [109] Dice coefficient, surface distance error, landmark curve distance error, local and global gyrification index Makropoulos et al [60] Dice coefficient works have included both neonatal and older infant/pediatric subjects in their studies; thus, such works also need to be included for the sake of completeness of the review. For instance, the 'LABEL' approach i.e.…”
Section: Authorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Only a few of the available segmentation algorithms are capable of dealing with structural abnormalities of the brain such as enlarged ventricles in ventriculomegaly (Gui, 2012;Cardoso, 2013) or impaired brain maturation related to congenital heart defects (CHD) [100]. For instance, Gui et al [43] applied their algorithm to pre-terms with dilated ventricles and the adaptive approach of Cardoso et al [17] included subjects with enlarged ventricles or cystic and diffuse WM injury.…”
Section: Limited Extension To Structural Abnormalities Of the Brainmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For the brain volume extraction, we first follow the method proposed by Cardoso et al (2013b) that employs a multi-atlas based segmentation propagation scheme for skull stripping neonatal MR brain scans. In this method, we can de-135 fine templates from a bank of subjects with manual segmentations, as a binary brain mask (obtained from the manual segmentation) and the corresponding T1w MRI scan.…”
Section: Skull Strippingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition to the limitations associated with each segmentation category, most of the previously described MR infant segmentation techniques were dedicated to segment infant brains either in the early infantile stage (≤5 months) or early adult-like stage (≥12 months) by using a T1 or T2 scan or the combination of both [120,122,127,128,132,134,136,141,145,147]. However, these methods would fail in the case of infants in the isointense stage (6-12 months), which is the primary focus of this thesis, because both WM and GM have roughly the same intensity levels (see Figure 20).…”
Section: The Proposed Segmentation Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%