Adaptación cultural y propiedades psicométricas de la versión en español-chileno del cuestionario Family Satisfaction in the Intensive Care Unit – 24 item

Fortunatti, Cristóbal Padilla; Rojas-Silva, N.; Molina-Muñoz, Yerko; Avendaño-Jara, Stefany

doi:10.1016/j.medin.2022.02.001

Cited by 2 publications

(1 citation statement)

References 28 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…The English version of the FS ICU‐24 has shown an internal consistency of α = 0.94 for the global scale, α = 0.92 for the satisfaction with care dimension, and α = 0.88 for the satisfaction with decision‐making dimension (Wall et al, 2007). The Spanish version FS ICU‐24 global scale has shown an internal consistency of α = 0.93 for the global scale, α = 0.90 for the satisfaction with care dimension, and α = 0.84 for the satisfaction with decision‐making scale (Padilla‐Fortunatti et al, 2022).…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Psychological distress, social support, and family satisfaction among family members of non‐COVID‐19 critical care patients: A cross‐sectional study

Fortunatti

Munro

Gattamorta

2022

J of Nursing Scholarship

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Purpose: This study aims to explore the associations among psychological distress, perceived social support, and family satisfaction among family members of non-COVID-19 intensive care unit (ICU) patients during the COVID-19 pandemic. Design:A cross-sectional study. Methods: Family members of patients with at least 48 h in the ICU and without a COVID-19 diagnosis were screened between January and March 2021. For enrolled ICU family members, five questionnaires for perceived stress (Perceived Stress Scale), anxiety symptoms (General Anxiety Disorder-7), depressive symptoms (Patient Health Questionnaire-9), perceived social support (Medical Outcomes Study Social Support Survey), and family satisfaction (Family Satisfaction with Care in the Intensive Care Unit-24) were administered by phone either in English or Spanish language. Sociodemographic and patient clinical data were also collected. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics, Pearson's correlations, Mann-Whitney U, and Fisher's exact tests. Findings: Of 87 eligible ICU family members, 63 were enrolled (72.4%); 27% of the sample presented with clinically significant symptoms of anxiety, 25.4% with depression, and 76.2% had a high perception of social support. ICU family members with low/fair perceived social support reported statistically significantly higher perceived stress and lower family satisfaction. Perceived stress was negatively correlated with family satisfaction. Clinically significant symptoms of anxiety and depression were not statistically associated with family satisfaction or perceived social support. Conclusions: While ICU admission-related stress may undermine family satisfaction, perceived social support may be positively associated with the way that ICU family members of non-COVID-19 patients evaluate the quality of care in the ICU. Knowing the factors that influence family satisfaction in the ICU may assist stakeholders and policy developers to improve family-centered care in the hospital setting. Clinical Relevance: Early screening for psychological distress and social support levels during admission should be included in updates of visiting and communication policies in the ICU. Prompt identification of family members at risk of a poor ICU experience may enhance efforts to support them, particularly in acute care settings where

show abstract

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%