Adaptation and inertia in dynamic environments

Abstract

Research summary: We address conflicting claims and mixed empirical findings about adaptation as a response to increased environmental dynamism. We disentangle distinct dimensions of environmental dynamism—the direction, magnitude, and frequency of change—and identify how selection shapes adaptive responses to these dimensions. Our results show how frequent directional changes undermine the value of exploration and decisively shift performance advantages to inert organizations that restrict exploration. In contrast, increased environmental variance rewards exploration. Our results also show that, in dynamic environments, the best‐performing organizations are generally more inert than less successful organizations. Managerial summary: Our research helps managers to understand under what business conditions investments into exploration and strategic flexibility are more likely to pay off. Dynamic business environments characterized by persistent trends and by large, infrequently occurring structural shocks reward strategic pursuit of temporary advantage. Thus, exploration and strategic flexibility are preferred strategies. In contrast, the challenge in frequently changing environments with fleeting opportunities is to identify and to focus on strategic actions whose payoffs on average are high, independent of environmental volatility. Low levels of exploration and long‐term strategic focus are preferred strategies in these circumstances. Copyright © 2015 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Maneuvering in Poor Visibility: How Firms Play the Ecosystem Game when Uncertainty is High

“…These dynamics will then steer the process toward intangible control points such as customer access, networking ability, or brand, all of which, at least conceptually, might even be amplified by waiving ownership on underlying assets (Alexy, West, Reitzig & Klapper, 2017). Indeed, in line with a growing body of conceptual work (Alexy et al, 2013;Tilson et al, 2010;Yoo et al, 2010) as well as insights from the linear ecosystems model (e.g., Gawer & Cusumano, 2002), our findings suggest that strategically sharing IP may be essential to moving the future ecosystem toward where the focal firm would want it; or to at least limit directional change (see Stieglitz, Knudsen, & Becker, 2016) to prevent drifting (see also Polidoro & Toh, 2011).…”

The Socio-Technical Dimension of Inertia in Digital Transformations

“…Organizations continuously exist in the tension between the need for strategic agility to address environmental changes, and the coherence of structures and practices [2,52]. The interactions between social entities and information technology aggravate this tension.…”

The antecedents of new R&D collaborations with different partner types: On the dynamics of past R&D collaboration and innovative performance

“…Given the ever-increasing velocity in today's dynamic business environments, which puts a premium on adaptability (Stieglietz et al, 2016), adaptation of R&D collaboration portfolios will form an increasingly critical issue to consider.…”