1983
DOI: 10.1002/1520-6629(198304)11:2<158::aid-jcop2290110209>3.0.co;2-z
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Adaptation and the quality of life in work and family settings

Abstract: The paper describes the development of scales to assess the perceived social‐environmental quality of work and family settings. The use of these scales in comparing and contrasting work and family settings and in examining their role as contexts for adaptation and growth is illustrated. Some tentative conclusions about social‐environmental influences on individual and family adaption are drawn and practical applications for planning ecologically oriented interventions are discussed.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

2
23
1

Year Published

1988
1988
2007
2007

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 69 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
2
23
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This sample consisted of parents who were identical and fraternal twins and of a small subsample of parents who were adoptive siblings. The findings from this study were somewhat different from the findings from studies with child-based designs and from the report by Kendler (1996) in that genetic and nonshared environmental influences were of primary importance for all of the constructs of parenting examined: warmth and support, negative control, and global control as assessed by the Family Environment Scale (Moos & Moos, 1983). For none of the constructs examined were shared environmental influences indicated.…”
Section: Genetic and Environmental Influences On Parentingcontrasting
confidence: 99%
“…This sample consisted of parents who were identical and fraternal twins and of a small subsample of parents who were adoptive siblings. The findings from this study were somewhat different from the findings from studies with child-based designs and from the report by Kendler (1996) in that genetic and nonshared environmental influences were of primary importance for all of the constructs of parenting examined: warmth and support, negative control, and global control as assessed by the Family Environment Scale (Moos & Moos, 1983). For none of the constructs examined were shared environmental influences indicated.…”
Section: Genetic and Environmental Influences On Parentingcontrasting
confidence: 99%
“…The architectural and interior design professions emphasize the importance of the design of the space within built environments and the way in which the organization of space affects human behavior. Supportive interpersonal relationships in work and family settings are associated with better individual and family functioning (Moos & Moos, 1983). Residential environments should be designed with considerable flexibility in order to contribute to an optimum family social climate and to the reduction of stress.…”
supporting
confidence: 84%
“…Relationship taps intermember support, open emotional expression, and conflictual interrelations in the family environment; Personal Growth assesses the underlying developmental directions and personal goals toward which the setting is oriented; and System Maintenance reflects the degree of structure, clarity, and openness to change that characterizes the family (Moos & Moos, 1983). The personal growth domain assesses how change has been channeled through the family system, spurring family members to invest effort in achieving new goals and indulging in cultural or leisure activities.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%