To better understand the binding mechanism of TRIM5␣ to retrovirus capsid, we had previously selected N-tropic murine leukemia virus (N-MLV) mutants escaping from rhesus macaque TRIM5␣ (rhTRIM5␣) by passaging the virus in rhTRIM5␣-expressing cells and selecting for nonrestricted variants. To test the commonality of the findings from the rhTRIM5␣ study, we have now employed a similar genetic approach using human TRIM5␣ (huTRIM5␣). Consistent with the rhTRIM5␣ study, the mapped huTRIM5␣ escape mutations were distributed across the capsid exterior, confirming the extended binding surface between virus and restriction factor. Compared to the results of the previous study, fewer escape mutations were identified, with particular mutants being repeatedly selected. Three out four huTRIM5␣ escape variants showed resistance to all primate TRIM5␣s tested, but two of them sacrificed viral fitness, observations that were not made in the rhTRIM5␣ study. Moreover, differences in amino acid changes associated with escape from hu-and rhTRIM5␣s suggested a charge dependence of the restriction by different TRIM5␣s. Taken together, these results suggest that the recognition of the entire capsid surface is a general strategy for TRIM5␣ to restrict MLV but that significantly different specific interactions are involved in the binding of TRIM5␣ from different species to the MLV capsid core. C apsid (CA)-binding retrovirus restriction factors have arisen on at least five occasions in the course of evolution. Their independent evolution is testament to the utility of such factors, either to limit endogenous retrovirus amplification or to inhibit infection by exogenous viruses (1-3). This group of factors includes Fv1 (4, 5), TRIM5␣ (6), and three independently arising hybrid factors, TRIM5CypA1 (7, 8), TRIM5CypA2 (9-12), and TRIM5CypA3 (13) in which a retrotransposed copy of the cellular cyclophilin-A gene has been inserted in the 3= end of the TRIM5 gene. At a minimum, these factors contain a virus CA-binding domain, as well as one or more multimerization domains (14-22).Restriction factor engagement appears to occur soon after retroviral core release into the cell cytoplasm, resulting either in proteasome-mediated CA degradation and an inhibition of reverse transcription (6) or an apparent sequestration of the reverse-transcribed preintegration complex en route to the cell nucleus (23).One of the least-appreciated aspects of restriction by these factors is the ability to restrict multiple species of retrovirus, a property that presumably reflects the ability of these factors to bind several different CA molecules. For example, TRIM5␣ from the cotton-top tamarin can restrict one or more members of the lentivirus, gammaretrovirus, betaretrovirus, and foamy virus genera (24-26), despite extensive differences in the sequences of their CA molecules. Nevertheless, restriction can be sensitive to a single amino acid change, as best characterized by the single change at CA position 110 of murine leukemia virus (MLV) that distinguishes between...