2004
DOI: 10.1097/00005537-200405000-00021
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Adaptation of the Horizontal Vestibuloocular Reflex in Pilots

Abstract: We suggest that these results might be explained by adaptations caused by VOR plasticity rather than habituation and that flight training might be responsible for the modulation of the vestibular function in pilots.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
24
1
2

Year Published

2007
2007
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
1
24
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…These findings are consistent with the results of previous studies which showed that the persons susceptible to motion sickness had higher than normal angular VOR gains in response to angular acceleration of 90°/s 2 [15], and to the rotations in the low frequency ranges (\0.08 Hz) [12,37]. However, previous studies debated on the increase of VOR gain during high frequency stimulation in those with motion sickness [12,16,38,39].…”
Section: Vestibular Dysfunction In Migrainesupporting
confidence: 92%
“…These findings are consistent with the results of previous studies which showed that the persons susceptible to motion sickness had higher than normal angular VOR gains in response to angular acceleration of 90°/s 2 [15], and to the rotations in the low frequency ranges (\0.08 Hz) [12,37]. However, previous studies debated on the increase of VOR gain during high frequency stimulation in those with motion sickness [12,16,38,39].…”
Section: Vestibular Dysfunction In Migrainesupporting
confidence: 92%
“…When subjects were rotated with a higher acceleration (200°/s 2 ) in this and a previous study , there was no relation between the high frequency aVOR gain and motion sickness susceptibility. Consistent with this, Nachum et al (2002) did not find a difference between the aVOR gain of motion sickness susceptible and non-susceptible subjects at higher frequencies of stimulation (2-5 Hz), and Lee et al (2004) also concluded that the aVOR gain is not a parameter that can be used as a measure of adaptation to motion sickness.…”
Section: High Frequency Avor Contributions To Motion Sickness Susceptmentioning
confidence: 67%
“…A recurrent fi nding has been that pilots have weaker or more short-lasting responses to rotatory stimuli ( 1,5,18 ). An increased gain value for nystagmus has also been reported ( 13,18 ). As regards spatial orientation, van Wulfften Palthe ( 24 ), in a pioneering study, performed experiments on the ability to perceive the change in roll position at the entering of a coordinated turn during fl ight.…”
mentioning
confidence: 64%