“…His diagrams of the situation (reproduced in our Translation) suggest that since the lines or edges extend over several cone diameters, the natural way to solve the problem would be to average – somehow – over the local sign values of the cones along the lengths of the contours (e.g., for vertical contours, above and below the offset). This is indeed how this paper has been widely cited: as the source of this theory (e.g., Badcock & Westheimer, 1985 ; Horton, Fahle, Mulder & Trauzettel-Klosinski, 2017 ; Matin, 1972 ; Levi & Waugh, 1996 ; Watt & Morgan, 1983 ; Westheimer, 2016 ; Westheimer & McKee, 1977 ). 3 In consequence, some have claimed that Hering’s theory has been disproved because dot stimuli can exhibit hyperacuity (e.g., Ludvigh, 1953 ; Westheimer & McKee, 1977 ), and so too can curved line stimuli ( Matin, 1972 ) – although in its defence, many others have shown length summation in hyperacuity experiments (e.g., Averill & Weymouth, 1925 ; French, 1920 ), if with qualifications ( Wang & Levi, 1994 ).…”