2005
DOI: 10.1123/mcj.9.2.197
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Adaptation to Separate Kinematic and Dynamic Transformations in Children and Adults

Abstract: The question addressed in the present study is whether children and adults are able to combine and decompose separate kinematic (visual-feedback-shift) and dynamic (velocity-dependent force) transformations in goal-directed arm movements. A total of 64 participants (32 adults and 32 children) performed horizontal forearm movements using a single-joint arm manipulandum. When participants first learned kinematic and dynamic transformations separately, target error decreased in a subsequent combined transformatio… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In AMT the TDSG and the forward and inverse input/output relationships of the MCS, BM and E systems are modeled independently and in parallel. This has been shown experimentally for dynamic and kinematic systems (Krakauer et al 1999, Jansen-Osmann et al 2005. It cannot happen with feedback error learning (Kawato and Gomi 1992) where the learned model corresponds to the inverse of the entire plant.…”
Section: Model Acquisition Storage and Selectionmentioning
confidence: 88%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In AMT the TDSG and the forward and inverse input/output relationships of the MCS, BM and E systems are modeled independently and in parallel. This has been shown experimentally for dynamic and kinematic systems (Krakauer et al 1999, Jansen-Osmann et al 2005. It cannot happen with feedback error learning (Kawato and Gomi 1992) where the learned model corresponds to the inverse of the entire plant.…”
Section: Model Acquisition Storage and Selectionmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…As indicated earlier, reach and grasp behavior is well established experimentally as having at least two underlying control DFs. Also, subjects can perform a two DF visual pursuit tracking task with no greater a central time delay than required to perform a one DF task (Navon et al 1984, Oytam et al 1998, 2005. This is an important finding.…”
Section: Control Degrees Of Freedommentioning
confidence: 99%