Adapting and developing a video-feedback intervention for co-parents of infants at risk of externalising behaviour problems (VIPP-Co): A feasibility study

Iles, Jane; Rosan, Camilla; Wilkinson, Esther L.; Ramchandani, Paul

doi:10.1177/1359104517704025

Cited by 16 publications

(11 citation statements)

References 32 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…The findings also give some confidence that those who may benefit from treatment can be identified using a simple screening questionnaire (SDQ). 42 The high levels of adherence and fidelity of treatment delivery seen in this pragmatic trial also suggest that this intervention can be reliably and successfully delivered in routine NHS practice.…”

Section: Summary Of Findingsmentioning

confidence: 78%

“…In stage 1, potential participants in participating NHS sites were screened for behaviour difficulties using the parent-reported SDQ. 42 The principal pathway for recruitment was through health visiting services, with health visitors screening families using a study screening pack during routine 12-and 24-month child health reviews. This was supplemented by direct screening undertaken by members of the research team and CRN support staff in the waiting room of these clinics and children's centres.…”

Section: Recruitment Proceduresmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…The SDQ 42 was used to measure behaviour problems as it is routinely used in both research and practice settings the UK. Participating caregivers were asked to complete this questionnaire.…”

Section: Strengths and Difficulties Questionnairementioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

A video-feedback parenting intervention to prevent enduring behaviour problems in at-risk children aged 12–36 months: the Healthy Start, Happy Start RCT

O’Farrelly

Barker

Watt

et al. 2021

Health Technol Assess

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background Behaviour problems emerge early in childhood and place children at risk for later psychopathology. Objectives To evaluate the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of a parenting intervention to prevent enduring behaviour problems in young children. Design A pragmatic, assessor-blinded, multisite, two-arm, parallel-group randomised controlled trial. Setting Health visiting services in six NHS trusts in England. Participants A total of 300 at-risk children aged 12–36 months and their parents/caregivers. Interventions Families were allocated in a 1 : 1 ratio to six sessions of Video-feedback Intervention to promote Positive Parenting and Sensitive Discipline (VIPP-SD) plus usual care or usual care alone. Main outcome measures The primary outcome was the Preschool Parental Account of Children’s Symptoms, which is a structured interview of behaviour symptoms. Secondary outcomes included caregiver-reported total problems on the Child Behaviour Checklist and the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire. The intervention effect was estimated using linear regression. Health and social care service use was recorded using the Child and Adolescent Service Use Schedule and cost-effectiveness was explored using the Preschool Parental Account of Children’s Symptoms. Results In total, 300 families were randomised: 151 to VIPP-SD plus usual care and 149 to usual care alone. Follow-up data were available for 286 (VIPP-SD, n = 140; usual care, n = 146) participants and 282 (VIPP-SD, n = 140; usual care, n = 142) participants at 5 and 24 months, respectively. At the post-treatment (primary outcome) follow-up, a group difference of 2.03 on Preschool Parental Account of Children’s Symptoms (95% confidence interval 0.06 to 4.01; p = 0.04) indicated a positive treatment effect on behaviour problems (Cohen’s d = 0.20, 95% confidence interval 0.01 to 0.40). The effect was strongest for children’s conduct [1.61, 95% confidence interval 0.44 to 2.78; p = 0.007 (d = 0.30, 95% confidence interval 0.08 to 0.51)] versus attention deficit hyperactivity disorder symptoms [0.29, 95% confidence interval –1.06 to 1.65; p = 0.67 (d = 0.05, 95% confidence interval –0.17 to 0.27)]. The Child Behaviour Checklist [3.24, 95% confidence interval –0.06 to 6.54; p = 0.05 (d = 0.15, 95% confidence interval 0.00 to 0.31)] and the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire [0.93, 95% confidence interval –0.03 to 1.9; p = 0.06 (d = 0.18, 95% confidence interval –0.01 to 0.36)] demonstrated similar positive treatment effects to those found for the Preschool Parental Account of Children’s Symptoms. At 24 months, the group difference on the Preschool Parental Account of Children’s Symptoms was 1.73 [95% confidence interval –0.24 to 3.71; p = 0.08 (d = 0.17, 95% confidence interval –0.02 to 0.37)]; the effect remained strongest for conduct [1.07, 95% confidence interval –0.06 to 2.20; p = 0.06 (d = 0.20, 95% confidence interval –0.01 to 0.42)] versus attention deficit hyperactivity disorder symptoms [0.62, 95% confidence interval –0.60 to 1.84; p = 0.32 (d = 0.10, 95% confidence interval –0.10 to 0.30)], with little evidence of an effect on the Child Behaviour Checklist and the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire. The primary economic analysis showed better outcomes in the VIPP-SD group at 24 months, but also higher costs than the usual-care group (adjusted mean difference £1450, 95% confidence interval £619 to £2281). No treatment- or trial-related adverse events were reported. The probability of VIPP-SD being cost-effective compared with usual care at the 24-month follow-up increased as willingness to pay for improvements on the Preschool Parental Account of Children’s Symptoms increased, with VIPP-SD having the higher probability of being cost-effective at willingness-to-pay values above £800 per 1-point improvement on the Preschool Parental Account of Children’s Symptoms. Limitations The proportion of participants with graduate-level qualifications was higher than among the general public. Conclusions VIPP-SD is effective in reducing behaviour problems in young children when delivered by health visiting teams. Most of the effect of VIPP-SD appears to be retained over 24 months. However, we can be less certain about its value for money. Trial registration Current Controlled Trials ISRCTN58327365. Funding This project was funded by the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Health Technology Assessment programme and will be published in full in Health Technology Assessment; Vol. 25, No. 29. See the NIHR Journals Library website for further project information.

show abstract

Section: Summary Of Findingsmentioning

confidence: 78%

Section: Recruitment Proceduresmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

A video-feedback parenting intervention to prevent enduring behaviour problems in at-risk children aged 12–36 months: the Healthy Start, Happy Start RCT

O’Farrelly

Barker

Watt

et al. 2021

Health Technol Assess

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…In the past 25 years, the intervention has been successfully adapted for various clinical and non-clinical populations (e.g. Hodes et al, 2014;Iles et al, 2017;Poslawsky et al, 2014;Stein et al, 2006;Van den Broek et al, 2017). Moreover, a meta-analysis showed a combined effect size of d = 0.47 for twelve randomised controlled trials (RCT) evaluating the effects of VIPP on parenting sensitivity (Juffer et al, 2017).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Development and feasibility of the prenatal video-feedback intervention to promote positive parenting for expectant fathers

Dijk

Waal

IJzendoorn

et al. 2021

Journal of Reproductive and Infant Psychology

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Objective: the transition period in which men become fathers might provide an important window of opportunity for parenting interventions that may produce long-term positive effects on paternal care and, consequently, child development. Existing prenatal programs traditionally focus on maternal and infant health and seldom involve the father. Study design: This paper describes an interaction-based prenatal parenting intervention program for first-time fathers using ultrasound images, the Prenatal video Feedback Intervention to promote Positive Parenting (VIPP-PRE). We randomised a group of expectant fathers (N = 73) to either the VIPP-PRE or a control condition. Results: Expectant fathers thought the VIPP-PRE was more helpful and influenced their insights into their babies to a greater extent than the control condition. Expectant fathers receiving the VIPP-PRE reported that they particularly liked seeing and interacting with their unborn children as well as receiving feedback on these interactions. The intervention was well received and was considered feasible by both expectant fathers and sonographers and midwives. Discussion: We discuss the VIPP-PRE based on the experiences and perspectives of fathers, interveners, and sonographers and midwives.

show abstract

“…It was originally developed to be used in families with newborn children in their first year of life, and has been then extended to older children and tested in several randomized controlled trials with different target populations ( Juffer et al, 2007 ; Dozier and Rutter, 2016 ). More recent adapted versions are under investigation: the version for fathers ( Iles et al, 2017 ), for day-care centers ( Werner et al, 2016 ), for twin families ( Euser et al, 2016 ) and for families with late-adopted children up to 6 years old ( Barone et al, 2017a ).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Testing an Attachment-Based Parenting Intervention-VIPP-FC/A in Adoptive Families with Post-institutionalized Children: Do Maternal Sensitivity and Genetic Markers Count?

Barone

Dellagiulia

et al. 2018

Front. Psychol.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This study investigated the effectiveness of a newly integrated version of an intervention targeting adoptive mothers’ positive parenting for promoting children’s emotional availability, by testing the moderating role of both two maternal genetic polymorphisms (i.e., 5HTTLPR and DRD4-VNTR) and emotional availability-EA on intervention outcomes. Mothers with their children (N = 80; Mage = 42.73 years, SD = 3.79; Mage = 33.18 months, SD = 16.83 months) participated in a RCT testing the Video-Feedback Intervention to Promote Positive Parenting and Sensitive Discipline-VIPP-FC/A effectiveness. Mixed effects regression models showed a significant improvement in mother–child EA for the VIPP-intervention vs. the dummy intervention condition, with a moderating role of maternal EA on children’s outcomes. No significant moderating effect was found for the two genetic polymorphisms inquired. Children’s and mother’s outcomes obtained are discussed.

show abstract

Adapting and developing a video-feedback intervention for co-parents of infants at risk of externalising behaviour problems (VIPP-Co): A feasibility study

Abstract: Background: Recent research on early-interventions with parents of infants at

Cited by 16 publications

References 32 publications

A video-feedback parenting intervention to prevent enduring behaviour problems in at-risk children aged 12–36 months: the Healthy Start, Happy Start RCT

A video-feedback parenting intervention to prevent enduring behaviour problems in at-risk children aged 12–36 months: the Healthy Start, Happy Start RCT

Development and feasibility of the prenatal video-feedback intervention to promote positive parenting for expectant fathers

Testing an Attachment-Based Parenting Intervention-VIPP-FC/A in Adoptive Families with Post-institutionalized Children: Do Maternal Sensitivity and Genetic Markers Count?

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About