2016
DOI: 10.1007/s10705-016-9767-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Adapting feeding methods for less nitrogen pollution from pig and dairy cattle farming: abatement costs and uncertainties

Abstract: 27This study assesses abatement costs of three measures aimed at reducing nitrogen (N) 28 emissions from livestock production: protein-adjusted feeding strategies for pigs, and 29 higher-quality forage for dairy cattle. In a partial cost approach, we quantified the effect of 30 different measures on N losses and production costs. We accounted for emissions of NH3, 31 N2O and NO from animal housing, manure storage, manure application, and from soils.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
0
5
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In farm animals, the interest in using low protein diets to reduce N excretion and emission of volatile N compounds is increasing [ 6 8 ]. In the pig industry, the introduction of low impact strategies need to be evaluated considering the feeding costs, the qualitative and quantitative aspects of the production, and the environmental benefits.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In farm animals, the interest in using low protein diets to reduce N excretion and emission of volatile N compounds is increasing [ 6 8 ]. In the pig industry, the introduction of low impact strategies need to be evaluated considering the feeding costs, the qualitative and quantitative aspects of the production, and the environmental benefits.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This finding is similar to IMAGE-Pig estimates of 16%, 19% and 21% for 1970, 1990, 2000 and 2010, respectively. Total excretion values agree with Sheldrik et al ( 2003) estimations of 10.4 TgN in 1996 (10.1 TgN by IMAGE-Pig). Excretion rates are also within the range of the average EU-28 values (Pierer et al 2016). Thus, IMAGE-Pig demonstrates that it is a useful tool in itself to evaluate the global and regional environmental impacts of pig production systems.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 52%
“…Так, дослідники стверджують, що виробництво кормів для годівлі свиней є найбільшим фактором впливу на навколишнє середовище у свинарстві (Dorca-Preda et al, 2021). У зв'язку з цим було розроблено безліч альтернативних методів годівлі та склади раціонів, спрямованих на зменшення забруднення навколишнього середовища (Pierer et al, 2016). Інші вчені підкреслюють необхідність розробки стратегій щодо знезараження та використання гною.…”
Section: таблицяunclassified