2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.entcs.2015.10.022
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Adapting Hidden Markov Models for Online Learning

Abstract: © 2015 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V.In modern computer systems, the intermittent behaviour of infrequent, additional loads affects performance. Often, representative traces of storage disks or remote servers can be scarce and obtaining real data is sometimes expensive. Therefore, stochastic models, through simulation and profiling, provide cheaper, effective solutions, where input model parameters are obtained. A typical example is the Markov-modulated Poisson process (MMPP), which can have its time … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Discretized MMPPs (or hidden Markov models) replicate the burstiness of TCP packet traces, which can be clustered in groups, and, hence, allow model parameters to converge on multiple traces simultaneously at reduced computational complexity [10]. Further, arrival parameters of queueing models can be updated incrementally via online EM learning algorithms [2,6,14], which are suitable for live systems.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Discretized MMPPs (or hidden Markov models) replicate the burstiness of TCP packet traces, which can be clustered in groups, and, hence, allow model parameters to converge on multiple traces simultaneously at reduced computational complexity [10]. Further, arrival parameters of queueing models can be updated incrementally via online EM learning algorithms [2,6,14], which are suitable for live systems.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The GLD "quality-of-fit" is ascertained only through a goodness-of-fit test as closed-form solutions do not exist for the lambda parameters. With response time moments obtained from variations of equations (4), (5), (6) and the algorithm from figure 1 (with different values for α priority weights), one can easily parametrize the GLD and obtain distributions. For our results, we compare response time moments from our analytical approximations with simulations on two different case studies.…”
Section: Response Time Distributionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to confirm our results of docking we used the HMM prediction method to compare its results with the docking results. Thus, in the present study, we used the aPPRove algorithm based on HMM [34] to validate the results using the HMM coupled to Bayesian models. The transition matrix was defined in order to study the transition probability among states.…”
Section: Hidden Markov Model Bayesian Protein-rnamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This online learning method is based on the method previously utilized in CISAT [23] and has been adapted here to be used with Hidden Markov Models to maintain uniformity when comparing different operation selection models in CISAT. Standard algorithms like Baum-Welch [33], are not stable for online learning in their original formulation [34] and significant advancements [35,36] need to be implemented for application in an online setting, an area to be explored in future work.…”
Section: Hidden Markov Model As a Framework For Operation Selectionmentioning
confidence: 99%