2012
DOI: 10.1007/s11517-012-0950-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Adapting source grid parameters to improve the condition of the magnetostatic linear inverse problem of estimating nanoparticle distributions

Abstract: The problem of estimating magnetic nanoparticle distributions from magnetorelaxometric measurements is addressed here. The objective of this work was to identify source grid parameters that provide a good condition for the related linear inverse problem. The parameters investigated here were the number of sources, the extension of the source grid, and the source direction. A new measure of the condition, the ratio between the largest and mean singular value of the lead field matrix, is proposed. Our results in… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The forward model is adapted with the intention to receive the maximum amount of information while keeping measurement data to a minimum. Previous adaptations include the investigation of different noise models, 24 use of multiple time points, 25 different inverse solution methods, 26 grid and sensors adaptations, 27,28 and different activation patterns and configurations of the coil array. [29][30][31][32][33][34][35] The difficulty lies in determining the information content of the forward model and comparing different forward models with each other.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The forward model is adapted with the intention to receive the maximum amount of information while keeping measurement data to a minimum. Previous adaptations include the investigation of different noise models, 24 use of multiple time points, 25 different inverse solution methods, 26 grid and sensors adaptations, 27,28 and different activation patterns and configurations of the coil array. [29][30][31][32][33][34][35] The difficulty lies in determining the information content of the forward model and comparing different forward models with each other.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…, the inverse problem using a better conditioned gain matrix (Eq. 11) is less influenced by low SNRs [9]. The optimal cluster size was found by evaluating the condition of different sized gain matrices, see Eq.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…ρ is defined in [29] as the ratio between the largest eigenvalue of F and the mean singular value size of F. Smaller ρ signifies a better numerical stability. The conventional condition measure (σ 1 · σ −1 L ) depends to a great extent on the smaller eigenvalues which make it difficult to compare different matrix sizes.…”
Section: A Measures Of Reconstruction Qualitymentioning
confidence: 99%