2020
DOI: 10.1609/aaai.v34i02.5550
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Adapting Stable Matchings to Evolving Preferences

Abstract: Adaptivity to changing environments and constraints is key to success in modern society. We address this by proposing “incrementalized versions” of Stable Marriage and Stable Roommates. That is, we try to answer the following question: for both problems, what is the computational cost of adapting an existing stable matching after some of the preferences of the agents have changed. While doing so, we also model the constraint that the new stable matching shall be not too different from the old one. After formal… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
39
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
2

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(40 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
1
39
0
Order By: Relevance
“…First, to better understand the NPcompleteness result, one may study the parameterized complexity with respect to the "degree" of incompleteness of the input preferences, such as the number of ties or the number of agents that are in the same equivalence class of the tie-relation. We refer to some recent papers on the parameterized complexity of preference-based stable matching problems [1,11,12,[14][15][16]29,[40][41][42]45] for this line of research. Second, we were not able to settle the computational complexity for complete preferences that are also single-peaked and single-crossing.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…First, to better understand the NPcompleteness result, one may study the parameterized complexity with respect to the "degree" of incompleteness of the input preferences, such as the number of ties or the number of agents that are in the same equivalence class of the tie-relation. We refer to some recent papers on the parameterized complexity of preference-based stable matching problems [1,11,12,[14][15][16]29,[40][41][42]45] for this line of research. Second, we were not able to settle the computational complexity for complete preferences that are also single-peaked and single-crossing.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We are closest to the purely theoretical work of Bredereck et al [2020], using their formulation of incremental stable matching problems (we refer to their related work section for an extensive discussion of related and motivating literature before 2020). Among others, they proved that INCREMENTAL STABLE MARRIAGE is polynomial-time solvable but is -hard parameterized by the allowed change between the two matchings) if the preferences may contain ties.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One wants to find a "stable" assignment of each resident to at most one hospital such that a given capacity for each hospital is respected. To model the task of adjusting a matching to change, Bredereck et al [2020] introduced the problem, given a stable matching with respect to some initial preference profile, to find a new matching which is stable with respect to an updated preference profile (where some agents performed swaps in their preferences) and which is as similar as possible to the given matching. They referred to this as the "incremental" scenario and studied the computational complexity of this question for STABLE MARRIAGE and STABLE ROOMMATES (both being one-to-one matching problems).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Bredereck et al [4] designed a polynomial-time algorithm for the following problem: given a bipartite graph G, a pair L and L ′ of preference lists for G, a stable matching M of (G, L) and a natural number k, decide whether (G, L ′ ) has a stable matching M ′ such that the symmetric difference of M and M ′ is at most k.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%