Adapting to Climate Change: Lessons from Farmers and Peri-Urban Fringe Residents in South Australia

Abstract

This paper reports on results from two major research projects conducted in South Australia. The first investigates adaptation to climate change in two of the state's major grain and sheep farming regions, using semi-structured interviews and focus groups. The second uses a postal questionnaire and an internet-based survey of residents in the peri-urban fringes of Adelaide, the state capital, to examine knowledge of and attitudes to climate change and resulting adaptations, especially in the context of increasing risk of wildfires. The research on adaptation to climate change in agriculture focused on formal institutions (e.g., government agencies) and communities of practice (e.g., farm systems groups). Both groups noted that farmers autonomously adapt to various risks, including those induced by climate variability. The types and levels of adaptation varied among individuals partly because of barriers to adaptation, which included limited communication and engagement processes established between formal institutions and communities of practice. The paper discusses possibilities for more effective transfers of knowledge and information on climate change among formal institutions, communities of practice, trusted individual advisors and farmers. Research in the peri-urban fringe revealed that actions taken by individuals to mitigate and/or adapt to climate change were linked to the nature of environmental values held (or ecological worldview) and place attachment. Individuals with a strong place attachment to the study area (the Adelaide Hills) who possessed knowledge of and/or beliefs in climate change were most likely to take mitigating actions. This was also linked to previous experience of major risk from wildfires. The paper concludes by discussing prospects for developing co-management for reducing the impact of climate change across multiple groups in rural and peri-urban areas.

Vulnerability of agriculture to climate change in Serbia - farmers’ assessment of impacts and damages

“…The respondents to the present survey felt that they would benefit from awareness raising and training in connection with climate change, which would certainly have an effect on the implementation of potential adaptation measures. Even though this segment was not part of the study, it should be noted that a common trait of farmers worldwide is that they will implement adaptation measures and accept training, if available (Robinson et al, 2018;Masud et al, 2017;Khatri-Chhetri et al, 2017). Training should be organized on a regional level, to present the latest advances in climate-smart agriculture, which facilitate adapting to climate change.…”

Understanding the Logic of Climate Change Adaptation: Unpacking Barriers to Climate Change Adaptation by Smallholder Farmers in Chimanimani District, Zimbabwe

“…An inductive approach with much focus on mixed sampling was used to select respondents [18]. The adoption of an inductive approach did not negatively influence the results of the study because when studying barriers to climate change adaptation, one can obtain new insights not based on a specific pre-determined theory but from a systematic approach [19]. Likewise, multiple data sources [20] were triangulated to ascertain the views expressed by respondents in each case.…”

“…Long-serving Agricultural Technical and Extension Services (AGRITEX) officers helped the researchers to select smallholder farmer participants who were abundantly endowed with knowledge related to the local climate change history. A supplementary FGD session was rescheduled and administered in Wards 4,6,18,19,and 20 to make a full complement. For this study, the rationale for running extra FGDs was defined by some outstanding characteristics that were twofold.…”

“…Firstly, these were wards in which data saturation could not be attained from the scheduled two FGDs. Data saturation means a stage in the data collection process where no new insights emerge from respondents [19]. Secondly, extra FGDs were scheduled for those wards with outstanding population sizes, that is, Ward 13 (Charter) with 11,042 persons and Ward 16 (Gwindingwi) with 12,967 persons [16].…”

New frontiers in agricultural geography: transformations, food security, land grabs and climate change

“…In an investigation into farmers' adaptations to climate change in South Australia, it was observed that most farmers interviewed did not believe in human-induced climate change. However, they acknowledged the occurrence of periods of excessive heat and/or drought and responded to these risks alongside others that affected their livelihoods, e.g., fluctuating prices, pests, changes to policy (Raymond & Robinson, 2013;Robinson et al, 2018). was the communities of practice that were the principal influence on the farmers as it was through these that farmers shared best practice and could learn from initiators of innovation in their local area.…”