Adaption and Validation of the Picker Employee Questionnaire With Hospital Midwives

Stahl, Katja; Schirmer, Claudia; Kaiser, Laura

doi:10.1016/j.jogn.2016.12.005

Cited by 15 publications

(54 citation statements)

References 15 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…This review highlighted a lack of clarity regarding the relationship between clinician experience and the related constructs of engagement and job satisfaction that were commonly captured alongside experience data in the included studies. The review identified a large number of qualitative studies exploring clinician experiences in the context of changes occurring in health services and system, with fewer (n = 24) survey studies, and just two articles that reported a service or system-level clinician experience survey (56,59). In these two studies, the Picker Staff/Employee Questionnaire was adapted and administered.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…The Picker Staff/Employee Questionnaire was the only tool that emerged that attempted to provide a validated instrument for capturing experience data amongst clinicians. The two articles in which this was used reported different adaptations of the Picker Questionnaire and only one of these by Stahl et al (2017) provided validation data (56,59). The nuanced nature of experience lends itself to qualitative research methods, reflected in the high volume of qualitative research articles identified (74).…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…The under-developed conceptualisation of clinician experience was reflected in the lack of survey research in this field. Twenty studies (18 from the database search and two from the grey literature) included survey methods to capture clinician experience data, with no single survey instrument widely adopted within these studies (27,28,(40)(41)(42)(43)(44)(45)(46)(47)(48)(49)(50)(51)(52)(53)(54)(55)(56). Of the identified studies, only two survey studies sought to assess clinician experience of providing care beyond a specific change event and using a survey instrument explicitly capturing experience outcomes (41,56).…”

Section: Question 2: What Survey Instruments and Measures Of Cliniciamentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Only one study sought to develop and validate a clinician experience measure (56). This survey was also utilised in the grey literature(57).…”

Section: Question 2: What Survey Instruments and Measures Of Cliniciamentioning

confidence: 99%

“…For example introduction of a new technology such as electronic medical record (EMR) across a health service (55) or to local-level quality improvement projects(53) was captured. Far fewer studies examined holistic clinician experience and focused on exploring experience of providing care across a range of events, interactions and points in the care-giving process (56).The body of evidence strongly indicated that clinician experience was captured and valued appropriately for the purpose of improving care, but that consideration of the experience of providing care on clinician's personal and professional lives was not a key driver of the data collection (64). In qualitative work, clinicians were recruited as key informants about the use of a new system, technology or model of care (65,66).…”

Section: Question 3: How Have Clinician Experience Measures Been Usedmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 4 more Smart Citations

Clinicians’ Experience of Providing Care: A Rapid Review

Iqbal¹,

Manias

Mimmo

et al. 2020

Preprint

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background Health care services internationally are refocussing care delivery towards patient centred, integrated care that utilises effective, efficient and innovative models of care to optimise patient outcomes and system sustainability. Whilst significant efforts have been made to examine and enhance patient experience, to date little has progressed in relation to provider experience. This review aims to explore this knowledge gap by capturing evidence of clinician experience, and how this experience is defined and measured in the context of health system change and innovation. Methods: A rapid review of published and grey literature review was conducted utilising a rapid evidence assessment methodology. 79 studies retrieved from the literature were included in the review. 14 articles were identified from the grey literature search and one article obtained via hand searching. In total, 94 articles were included in the review. This study was commissioned by and co-designed with the New South Wales, Ministry of Health. Results: Clinician experience of delivering health care is inconsistently defined in the literature, with identified articles lacking clarity regarding distinctions between experience, engagement and work-related outcomes such as job satisfaction. Clinician experience was commonly explored using qualitative research that focused on experiences of discrete health care activities or events in which a change was occurring. Such research enabled exploration of complex experiences. In these contexts, clinician experience was captured in terms of self-reported information that clinicians provided about the health care activity or event, their perceptions of its value, the lived impacts they experienced, and the specific behaviours they displayed in relation to the activity or event. Moreover, clinician’s experience has been identified to have a paucity of measurement tools. Conclusion: Literature to date has not examined clinician experience in a holistic sense. In order to achieve the goals identified in relation to value-based care, further work is needed to conceptualise clinician experience and understand the nature of measurement tools required to assess this. In health system application, a broader ‘clinician pulse’ style assessment may be valuable to understand the experience of clinical work on a continuum rather than in the context of episodes of change/care.

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Question 2: What Survey Instruments and Measures Of Cliniciamentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Only one study sought to develop and validate a clinician experience measure (56). This survey was also utilised in the grey literature(57).…”

Section: Question 2: What Survey Instruments and Measures Of Cliniciamentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Question 3: How Have Clinician Experience Measures Been Usedmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 3 more Smart Citations

Clinicians’ Experience of Providing Care: A Rapid Review

Iqbal¹,

Manias

Mimmo

et al. 2020

Preprint

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Nachhaltigkeit – ein Wegweiser der zukunftsorientierten Hebammenarbeit

Frey¹

2022

Hebamme

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Im Rahmen einer Bachelorarbeit im Fachbereich Hebammenkunde wurden mittels einer qualitativen Herangehensweise Gründe für den Verbleib von Kreißsaal-Hebammen im Beruf identifiziert. Arbeiten dieser und ähnlicher Thematik bereichern die Nachhaltigkeitsdebatte im deutschen Hebammenwesen und legen einen Grundstein für die zukunftsorientierte Hebammenarbeit.

show abstract