2021
DOI: 10.1002/acs.3286
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Adaptive finite‐time tracking control for parameterized nonlinear systems with full state constraints

Abstract: Summary In this article, the issue of adaptive finite‐time dynamic surface control (DSC) is discussed for a class of parameterized nonlinear systems with full state constraints. Using the property of logarithmic function, a one‐to‐one nonlinear mapping is constructed to transform a constrained system into an unconstrained system with the same structure. The nonlinear filter is constructed to replace the first‐order linear filter in the traditional DSC, and the demand on the filter time constant is reduced. Bas… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
(92 reference statements)
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…20 In addition, it is known that many practical systems will be inevitably affected by various constraints and dealing with the constraint problem in control design has aroused extensive research interest. [21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29] Different methods has been proposed to handle the constraints with output and state constraints. 20,30 It should be noted that the above references do not study the adaptive prescribed-time control with output and state constraints.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…20 In addition, it is known that many practical systems will be inevitably affected by various constraints and dealing with the constraint problem in control design has aroused extensive research interest. [21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29] Different methods has been proposed to handle the constraints with output and state constraints. 20,30 It should be noted that the above references do not study the adaptive prescribed-time control with output and state constraints.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, the controller is fully valid for not only the finite time interval but also beyond the settling time 20 . In addition, it is known that many practical systems will be inevitably affected by various constraints and dealing with the constraint problem in control design has aroused extensive research interest 21–29 . Different methods has been proposed to handle the constraints with output and state constraints 20,30 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Neural network (NN) control with learning capability and good quality in an approximation of nonlinear function is a useful selection for modeling complicated processes and compensating for unstructured uncertainties [34][35][36]. Wu et al [37] presented a tracking control method leveraging RBFNN with the aim of minimizing the tracking error in nonlinear systems. Qiu et al [38] introduced an adaptive NN control algorithm tailored for MIMO nonlinear systems to tackle unknown dynamical behaviors.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nevertheless, for conventional adaptive control, the regulation time is not guaranteed and may be long because the classical stability concepts are only applicable in the sense that the time tends to infinity. In order to meet the time requirements in practical applications, the concept of finite‐time stability was proposed in References 22‐25. By combining a finite‐time control theory and backstepping technique, Li et al 26 designed a novel adaptive tracking controller for full‐state constrained systems.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%