2014
DOI: 10.1017/s0263574714002392
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Adaptive hybrid suppression control of space free-flying robots with flexible appendages

Abstract: SUMMARYControl of rigid–flexible multi-body systems in space, during cooperative manipulation tasks, is studied in this paper. During such tasks, flexible members such as solar panels may vibrate. These vibrations in turn can lead to oscillatory disturbing forces on other subsystems, and consequently may produce significant errors in the position of operating end-effectors of cooperative arms. Therefore, to design and implement efficient model-based controllers for such complicated nonlinear systems, deriving … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Such a paradigm is aimed at enforcing an equivalent impedance relationship both at the manipulator end-effectors and at the grasped object level. The MIC approach has been recently extended to the cooperative manipulation of flexible objects in Zarafshan et al (2016).…”
Section: Controlmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such a paradigm is aimed at enforcing an equivalent impedance relationship both at the manipulator end-effectors and at the grasped object level. The MIC approach has been recently extended to the cooperative manipulation of flexible objects in Zarafshan et al (2016).…”
Section: Controlmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Solutions minimizing flexible appendages coupling with the SMS through optimized trajectories [19] or using coupling factors in the control strategy [20], nonlinear Model Predictive Control minimizing disturbances form manipulator motions [21] have been adopted. Active control of vibrations disturbances, such as the use of piezoelectric actuators placed on the flexible elements [22] or joint variable stiffness control actuators [23], has shown limitations for actual missions. This can be illustrated with capture scenarios when target presents flexible appendages for instance.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For instance, a manipulator's end-effector trajectory optimization can include vibration suppression objectives while capturing a defined target [27] or an input disturbance torque can be included to improve control performances for an OOS operation [28]. The Newton-Euler approaches are mostly used to obtain the dynamics for a combination of rigid and flexible bodies system [29,30] but Lagrangian methods which are well suited to control design can also be adopted [31].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The flexible link has lightweight, less inertia, low energy consumption, sizeable working place, and high work efficiency. But, it may deform and vibrate [27,28,29]. The flexible joint, caused by the harmonic drive gears, can reduce the damage caused by a collision when the manipulator grabs the target object and can compensate for the torque.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%