2017
DOI: 10.2514/1.g002981
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Adaptive Impact Time Control Via Look-Angle Shaping Under Varying Velocity

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
30
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 74 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
30
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Eqs. (20) and (24), it can be concluded that the proposed time-to-go estimation extends the 2D algorithm to a projected plan containing the LOS vector and missile velocity vector in the 3D scenario.…”
Section: A Impact Time Prediction In Three-dimensional Engagementmentioning
confidence: 85%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Eqs. (20) and (24), it can be concluded that the proposed time-to-go estimation extends the 2D algorithm to a projected plan containing the LOS vector and missile velocity vector in the 3D scenario.…”
Section: A Impact Time Prediction In Three-dimensional Engagementmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…Remark 2 If we only consider the 2D engagement, pitch plane for example, we have σ = θ M and φ M = 0. Then, the predicted time-to-go (20) reduces to…”
Section: A Impact Time Prediction In Three-dimensional Engagementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since the acceleration command a ξ can be considered as a proportional factor multiplied to gð⋅Þ, as shown in Equa-tion (20), the perturbed shaping trajectory (i.e., the result of impact time control), to a large extent, relies on the value of a ξ . To perform analysis, we remove the sign function hð⋅Þ from Equation 18and replace jξ T j by ξ T , obtaining the same expression as that of [6].…”
Section: Derivation Of Impact Time Control Guidance Lawmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To avoid considerable effort to time-to-go, the ITCG law without using time-to-go has been developed in recent studies [18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31]. Tekin et al [18][19][20][21][22] proposed a series of notable guidance laws under various conditions using polynomial shaping of the look angle and range and the feedback linearization technique. Gutman [23] discussed a novel guidance law for impact time control using the concept of the zero-effort miss vector.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The guidance law applied the remaining engagement time instead of time-to-go estimation and the guidance gain was calculated by numerically solving an integral equation. In [15] Tekin extended the previous work by using adaptive guidance schemes by predicting the mean velocity to update the guidance gains in order to deal with the missiles timevarying velocity problem.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%