2020
DOI: 10.3837/tiis.2020.06.019
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Adaptive k-means clustering for Flying Ad-hoc Networks

Abstract: Flying ad-hoc networks (FANETs) is a vibrant research area nowadays. This type of network ranges from various military and civilian applications. FANET is formed by micro and macro UAVs. Among many other problems, there are two main issues in FANET. Limited energy and high mobility of FANET nodes effect the flight time and routing directly. Clustering is a remedy to handle these types of problems. In this paper, an efficient clustering technique is proposed to handle routing and energy problems. Transmission r… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
(36 reference statements)
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Furthermore, the work in [30] formulated a Maximum Stable Set Problem (MSSP) using the vehicles' similarity scores and solving it with the Continuous Hopfield Network (CHN) to estimate the K number and select the initial medoids. For single-hop clustering, the authors in reference [31] stated that the covered geography and transmission range are inversely proportional to the cluster size. Therefore, they proposed a brute force method to learn the K number by randomly selecting a CH, assigning the in-range vehicles to it, and then repeating the process for the remaining unassigned vehicles.…”
Section: Background and Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, the work in [30] formulated a Maximum Stable Set Problem (MSSP) using the vehicles' similarity scores and solving it with the Continuous Hopfield Network (CHN) to estimate the K number and select the initial medoids. For single-hop clustering, the authors in reference [31] stated that the covered geography and transmission range are inversely proportional to the cluster size. Therefore, they proposed a brute force method to learn the K number by randomly selecting a CH, assigning the in-range vehicles to it, and then repeating the process for the remaining unassigned vehicles.…”
Section: Background and Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This research proposes a mechanism whose performance is assessed by contrasting it with three topology construction methods, K-means [13] , DCM [14] and MMF [15] .…”
Section: Performance Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…And we cluster services with no reduce the dimension of user side. K-means algorithm is interpretable and easy to implement, so we use K-means algorithm to cluster users and services [25]. However, it is well known that the clustering results of K-means will be different each time [26].…”
Section: Modeling User Groups and Service Groupsmentioning
confidence: 99%