2014
DOI: 10.1108/compel-10-2012-0218
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Adaptive level set method for accurate boundary shape in optimization of electromagnetic systems

Abstract: Purpose -The purpose of this paper is to present a new numerical technique, called adaptive level set method, for use with the finite element method. Design/methodology/approach -A conventional level set method using the smeared Heaviside function has been employed for shape and topology optimizations. The smeared Heaviside function yields an indistinct interface boundary, and so can increase computational time and cause numerical errors. The adaptive level set method does not use the smeared Heaviside functio… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The discrete adjoint variable method [91]- [93] and continuum adjoint variable method [94]- [97] outperform the finite difference methods in the number of required objective function evaluations at each step [85]. Unlike finite difference methods, they obtain the objective function gradient with respect to all design parameters using one additional simulation for each iteration [88], [91], [98].…”
Section: Central Finite Difference F(x) Figure 18 a Clarification Of The Finite Difference Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The discrete adjoint variable method [91]- [93] and continuum adjoint variable method [94]- [97] outperform the finite difference methods in the number of required objective function evaluations at each step [85]. Unlike finite difference methods, they obtain the objective function gradient with respect to all design parameters using one additional simulation for each iteration [88], [91], [98].…”
Section: Central Finite Difference F(x) Figure 18 a Clarification Of The Finite Difference Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This method obtains sensitivity by differentiating the governing variational equation before discretization. The sensitivity formulas are formed using the material derivative concept of the continuum mechanics and based on the analytical equations of the state and the adjoint variables as described in [94] and [95].…”
Section: Central Finite Difference F(x) Figure 18 a Clarification Of The Finite Difference Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, by using the computation program for high voltage electric field automatic optimization, a new uniform field electrode profile was obtained as a replacement of the 3D dimensional finite difference method profile. Other optimum 3D dimensional axisymmetric electrode profiles are also obtained which are enclosed with metallic coaxial cylinder [9,10].…”
Section: P R E V I E Wmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…After the shape deformation, the finite element mesh is regenerated to match the material interface with the boundaries of finite elements. This technique is called the adaptive level set method and allows the interface to clearly distinguish between different materials (Lee et al 2014;Park 2019). The numerical analysis of the superconducting system is performed again, and the iterative procedure is continued until the convergence criterion is attained.…”
Section: Optimization Schemementioning
confidence: 99%