2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.apnum.2016.10.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Adaptive multistep time discretization and linearization based on a posteriori error estimates for the Richards equation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
11
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
1
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We hope instead that there will be continued development and adoption of new spatial and temporal discretization schemes. Following trends of maturing computational fields, we expect to see improved, adaptive algorithms driven by solution dynamics and a posteriori error estimates (Mostaghimi et al, 2015;Baron et al, 2017). Moreover, approaches are needed that consider entire solution error and dynamics-for example, joint space-time discretization and error control (Solin and Kuraz, 2011) rather than just a MOL approach with temporal adaptivity but static spatial approximation (Farthing et al, 2003b).…”
Section: Discussion and Alternativesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We hope instead that there will be continued development and adoption of new spatial and temporal discretization schemes. Following trends of maturing computational fields, we expect to see improved, adaptive algorithms driven by solution dynamics and a posteriori error estimates (Mostaghimi et al, 2015;Baron et al, 2017). Moreover, approaches are needed that consider entire solution error and dynamics-for example, joint space-time discretization and error control (Solin and Kuraz, 2011) rather than just a MOL approach with temporal adaptivity but static spatial approximation (Farthing et al, 2003b).…”
Section: Discussion and Alternativesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this subsection, we numerically investigate the rates of convergence in space and time of the different schemes. Following the framework presented in [7,70], we employ a manufactured solution to test the methods. The idea is to use an arbitrary sufficiently differentiable function as exact solution with a source term for the computation of numerical errors.…”
Section: Manufactured Solutionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Here, we perform numerical simulations using the test case presented in [7] for two layers of soil with same characteristics given by the relations (5.13)-(5.14) for the capillary pressure and the relative hydraulic conductivity with the parameter values (5.19), except for the saturated hydraulic conductivity K s which changes in the medium. The computational domain is the square [0 cm, 100 cm]×[0 cm, 100 cm] with variable saturated hydraulic conductivity as shown in Figure 16.…”
Section: Layers Of Soil Of L-shape Formmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Srivastava and Yeh (1991) used a Laplace transformation technique to obtain analytical solutions of the transient flows in homogeneous and two-layer soils, while Tracy (2006) proposed two-and three-dimensional analytical solutions of the RE using simple exponential models. Although their actual applicability is limited, these are good references for theoretical analysis (Zambra et al, 2012;Liu et al, 2015;Baron et al, 2017).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%