2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.asoc.2018.06.044
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Adaptive predator–prey optimization for tuning of infinite horizon LQR applied to vehicle suspension system

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This paper evaluates control performances to packet loss by comparing between the H 1 controller and an LQ controller which does not care packet loss [8]. Tuning parameters in both controller designs are set to be the same step response for fair comparison of control performances.…”
Section: Numerical Examplementioning
confidence: 99%
“…This paper evaluates control performances to packet loss by comparing between the H 1 controller and an LQ controller which does not care packet loss [8]. Tuning parameters in both controller designs are set to be the same step response for fair comparison of control performances.…”
Section: Numerical Examplementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, Shu Kai et al 25 proposed a linear decline of inertia weight particle swarm optimization algorithm, Its inertia weight linear decline of dynamic as the number of iterations increases to improve the optimization effect of the algorithm. Later, scholars also improved the particle swarm optimization algorithm from the optimization result and convergence speed, [26][27][28][29] but most can't consider both the convergence speed and optimization effect. In the light of the characteristics of LQR control of elevator car horizontal vibration, to find the weighting coefficient matrix Q of LQR controller more quickly and effectively, this paper proposes a Jumping inertia Weight Particle Swarm Optimization (JWPSO) algorithm which can adjust the inertia weight of PSO adaptively according to the objective function value and optimizes the weighting matrix Q of LQR control by using JWPSO to improve further the LQR control effect of elevator car horizontal vibration primary control and then simulates the elevator car horizontal vibration by MATLAB/Simulink to analyze the effect of active control.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The literature contains several models for the simulation of the dynamic behavior of vehicles. These models can be categorized into three groups of quarter, 1416 half 1720 and full-vehicle models. 2125 Naturally, if the vehicle model in simulation is more complete, the dynamic response obtained from the model will be more reliable.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%