2003 IEEE 58th Vehicular Technology Conference. VTC 2003-Fall (IEEE Cat. No.03CH37484) 2003
DOI: 10.1109/vetecf.2003.1285103
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Adaptive reliability calculation for block turbo codes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This shows that besides producing increased d mm faster (with smaller s), the ordered shortening scheme is also able to produce smaller Ad values for the smaller d terms. Note also that although the A 4 value in s-Hamming(18,13) of ordered shortening is larger, the A\2 value in s-PC(18,13)" of ordered shortening is smaller. This is because the An value of s-PC( 18,13) 2 is contributed by both the A3 and A4 values of s-Hamming( 18,13).…”
mentioning
confidence: 92%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This shows that besides producing increased d mm faster (with smaller s), the ordered shortening scheme is also able to produce smaller Ad values for the smaller d terms. Note also that although the A 4 value in s-Hamming(18,13) of ordered shortening is larger, the A\2 value in s-PC(18,13)" of ordered shortening is smaller. This is because the An value of s-PC( 18,13) 2 is contributed by both the A3 and A4 values of s-Hamming( 18,13).…”
mentioning
confidence: 92%
“…(18,13) .conventional shortening s-PC(1 Q ^f .ordered shortening I Comparison of Aj between ordered and conventional shortening for (a) s-Hamming( 18,13)and(b)s-PC(18,13) 3a shows that the proposed ordered shortening scheme produces s-Hamming(18,13) with smaller Ad values than conventional shortening for d = 3 and 5. This is also true for s-PC(18,13) as shown inFig. 4.3b, for all values of d = 9, 12 and 15.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%