2017 12th International Conference on Intelligent Systems and Knowledge Engineering (ISKE) 2017
DOI: 10.1109/iske.2017.8258801
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Adaptive semi-supervised consensus model for multi-criteria large group decision making in a linguistic setting

Abstract: University of Bristol -Explore Bristol Research General rightsThis document is made available in accordance with publisher policies. Please cite only the published version using the reference above. Abstract-In this paper we investigate the consensus reaching problem for Large Group Multi-Criteria Decision Making (MCLGDM). We present an adaptive, semi-supervised consensus model for MCLGDM problems with preferences expressed as Comparative Linguistic Expressions. Specifically, our work introduces an adaptive, s… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

1
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
(57 reference statements)
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…If the consensus degree exceeds the threshold (CD c(r) > threshold), the group moves on to the selection phase; otherwise, the consensus builder takes appropriate steps to increase the level of agreement in the following consensus round. This can be done in different ways including through an interactive feedback process [13] and automatic adjustment of the participants' preferences [25]. Consensus must be achieved before a maximum predefined number of iterations r max is surpassed, i.e., the process continues until CD c(r) ≥ threshold or r > r max .…”
Section: Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If the consensus degree exceeds the threshold (CD c(r) > threshold), the group moves on to the selection phase; otherwise, the consensus builder takes appropriate steps to increase the level of agreement in the following consensus round. This can be done in different ways including through an interactive feedback process [13] and automatic adjustment of the participants' preferences [25]. Consensus must be achieved before a maximum predefined number of iterations r max is surpassed, i.e., the process continues until CD c(r) ≥ threshold or r > r max .…”
Section: Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Romero-Gelvez, e Garcia-Melon ( 2016) " A consensus reaching process in a Group Decision Making (GDM) problem is an iterative process composed by several discussion rounds in which experts are expected to modify their preferences according to the advice given by a facilitator." Palomares et al, (2017) "… bringing DMs preferences closer to each other before making a decision"…”
Section: Referênciamentioning
confidence: 99%