Adaptive Significance and Long-Term Survival of Asexual Lineages

Abstract

International audienceImportant questions remain about the long-term survival and adaptive significance of eukaryotic asexual lineages. Numerous papers dealing with sex advantages still continued to compare parthenogenetic populations versus sexual populations arguing that sex demonstrates a better fitness. Because asexual lineages do not possess any recombination mechanisms favoring rapid changes in the face of severe environmental conditions, they should be considered as an evolutionary dead-end. Nevertheless, reviewing literature dealing with asexual reproduction, it is possible to draw three stimulating conclusions. (1) Asexual reproduction in eukaryotes considerably differs from prokaryotes which experience recombination but neither meiosis nor syngamy. Recombination and meiosis would be a driving force for sexual reproduction. Eukaryotes should therefore be considered as a continuum of sexual organisms that are more or less capable (and sometimes incapable) of sexual reproduction. (2) Rather than revealing ancestral eukaryotic forms, most known lineages of asexual eukaryotes have lost sex due to a genomic conflict affecting their sexual capacity. Thus, it could be argued that hybridization is a major cause of their asexuality. Asexuality may have evolved as a reproductive mechanism reducing conflict within organisms. (3) It could be proposed that, rather than being generalists, parthenogenetic hybrid lineages could be favored when exploiting peculiar restricted ecological niches, following the "frozen niche variation" model. Although hybrid events may result in sex loss, probably caused by genomic conflict, asexual hybrids could display new original adaptive traits, and the rapid colonization of environments through clonal reproduction could favor their long-term survival, leading to evolutionary changes and hybrid speciation. Examination of the evolutionary history of asexual lineages reveals that evolutionary processes act through transitional stages in which even very small temporary benefits may be enough to counter the expected selective disadvantages

Genome-scale data reveal the role of hybridization in lichen-forming fungi

“…A number of studies show that hybrid sterility develops as a result of incompatibilities in the genome 21,107,108 . As many species of lichen-forming fungi can reproduce both sexually and asexually, it's possible that the evolution of hybrid sterility could trigger a lichen-forming fungus to rely primarily on asexual reproduction.…”

Nonrandom Patterns of Genetic Admixture Expose the Complex Historical Hybrid Origin of Unisexual Leaf Beetle Species in the GenusCalligrapha

“…These modes of origin-specifically, spontaneous and contagious origins-typically give rise to lineages that show mixed reproductive modes. Yet the vast majority of species in evolutionary lineages that develop obligate unisexuality seem to derive from a different mechanism altogether: interspecific hybridization (Bullini 1994;Lodé 2013).…”

What, if Anything, are Species?

“…One major problem with a theoretically-defined species account such as this is that it excludes groups that are empirically regarded by biologists as "good species" but which do not satisfy its criterion. Examples include asexual organisms (Bogart 2003;Lodé 2013;Moritz and Bi 2011), mostly asexual (yet occasionally prolifically exchanging genes) microbial organisms (Ochman, Lerat, et al 2005;Wilkins 2007a), and, as mentioned, hybridizers. The BSC is not the only possible theoretical species concept, of course.…”