2004
DOI: 10.1109/jmems.2004.835774
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Adaptive Tip-Withdrawal Control for Reliable Microfabrication by Localized Electrodeposition

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
20
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Consequently, the LECD process is generally less expensive than the LIGA process. [5][6][7] Furthermore, LECD avoids the difficulty in filling the solution inside high aspect ratio patterns encountered during LIGA processing.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Consequently, the LECD process is generally less expensive than the LIGA process. [5][6][7] Furthermore, LECD avoids the difficulty in filling the solution inside high aspect ratio patterns encountered during LIGA processing.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…LECD is generally performed with micrometer-sized insoluble anode and conductive cathode immersed in the solution containing metal ions which, once reduced, bring about the microstructures. [3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11] The feasibility of forming the microstructure is related to the following factors: the applied voltage and distance between the two electrodes, 3,[5][6][7][8][9] the fabrication procedure, geometry, 3 rotation and vibration of the electrodes, 10,11 and the composition and additives of the electrolyte. 5 On the other hand, the shape and dimension of the microstructure are controlled by the relative motion of the anode to the cathode.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The choice of electrolyte for the electrodeposition process has so far been derived mostly from the electrolyte used for the electroplating of the same metal. Repeatability of localized electrochemical dep osition has been a challenge due to the lack of a proper feedback gap control to maintain a stable interelectrode gap [25]. Accumulation of bubbles, which hinder the deposition by blocking the interelectrode gap region, is a reason for the nonimplementation of electrodeposition over longer periods.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The output of the integrator is used to tune a voltage-controlled oscillator that generates pulses at a rate proportional to the tuning voltage amplitude and is also used to trigger positioner movement at a speed corresponding to the generated pulse rate. The pulse generation rate would thus be modulated by the total change in the deposition current resulting from either a decrease in the tipdeposit spacing due to deposition growth, or from an increase in the tip-deposit spacing due to tip withdrawal away from the deposit end (29). Figure 7 shows a scanning electron microscope (SEM) image of an example of a successfully deposited copper column, which has a diameter of about 25 mm and a length of about 6.5 mm, thus giving an aspect ratio of 1:282.…”
Section: Lecd With Conventional Analog Feedback Controlmentioning
confidence: 99%