1991
DOI: 10.1111/j.1095-8312.1991.tb00600.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Adaptive variation in head size in Vipera berus L. populations

Abstract: To prove that predators are morphologically adapted to the size of their prey one has to demonstrate that the morphological variation in the trophic apparatus is related to the prey size distribution and that the variation in the trait has some effect on individual fitness. I have studied geographic variation in relative head length (RHL) of adders, Vipera berus, on the Swedish mainland and on groups of islands in the Baltic Sea, and the relationship between RHL and physical condition, a character related to f… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
41
0
1

Year Published

1992
1992
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 67 publications
(44 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
2
41
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Mainland Tiger snakes typically produce litters composed of numerous small neonates that feed on a wide range of small prey items (Aubret, 2012). Insularity created a potentially huge mismatch between prey size and neonate swallowing ability (that is, due to drastically different prey assemblages), generating intense selective pressure for an increase in body and head size of neonate snakes (Forsman, 1991;King, 2002;Aubret et al, 2004a; Figure 3 Body mass rates of evolution and levels of adaptive plasticity. Rates of evolution in body mass in grams per generation were significantly correlated with the level of plasticity for head growth in response to prey size calculated for five island populations (linear regression; R 2 ¼ 0.88; F 1, 3 ¼ 21.14; Po0.019).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Mainland Tiger snakes typically produce litters composed of numerous small neonates that feed on a wide range of small prey items (Aubret, 2012). Insularity created a potentially huge mismatch between prey size and neonate swallowing ability (that is, due to drastically different prey assemblages), generating intense selective pressure for an increase in body and head size of neonate snakes (Forsman, 1991;King, 2002;Aubret et al, 2004a; Figure 3 Body mass rates of evolution and levels of adaptive plasticity. Rates of evolution in body mass in grams per generation were significantly correlated with the level of plasticity for head growth in response to prey size calculated for five island populations (linear regression; R 2 ¼ 0.88; F 1, 3 ¼ 21.14; Po0.019).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…and A. n. mexicana; for mass r 2 = 0.945, including Porthidium spp. ); these residuals are treated here as relative tail length (RTL) and relative stoutness (RST), respectively (see Forsman, 1991).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Forsman (1991b) found phenotypic variation in head length among mainland and island populations of Vipera berus. Adders inhabiting islands with large voles Microtus agrestis had longer heads (relative to body size) than adders living on islands with smaller voles.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 85%