2017
DOI: 10.1007/s11760-017-1142-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Adaptive video-aware forward error correction code allocation for reliable video transmission

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Suppose that frames I, P1, and P2 correspond to 8, 4, and 4 packets, respectively (the frames are divided into packets for transmission based on the maximum transmission unit (MTU)). Under the conditions of RS coding, we use RS (16,8) to encode Window-1 to generate 8 repair packets. For frame P1, RS (16,12) is used on Window-2 to generate 4 repair packets; for frame P2, RS (20,16) is used on Window-3 to generate 4 repair packets.…”
Section: B the Problem With Time-order Coding Window Managementmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Suppose that frames I, P1, and P2 correspond to 8, 4, and 4 packets, respectively (the frames are divided into packets for transmission based on the maximum transmission unit (MTU)). Under the conditions of RS coding, we use RS (16,8) to encode Window-1 to generate 8 repair packets. For frame P1, RS (16,12) is used on Window-2 to generate 4 repair packets; for frame P2, RS (20,16) is used on Window-3 to generate 4 repair packets.…”
Section: B the Problem With Time-order Coding Window Managementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, the recovered packets of the current frame cannot help to recover the lost packets of previous frames, and the The associate editor coordinating the review of this manuscript and approving it for publication was Zilong Liu . distortion of the previous frames may propagate to the current and following frames. In GOP-level FEC, the FEC coding window contains all the video frames in a GOP to produce the corresponding FEC redundancies [7], [8]. By utilizing a large coding window, GOP-level FEC is capable of handling burst loss.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The authors [31] analyzed several FEC approaches for error-free transmission of videos in varying network scenarios. RS encoding is applied at the packet, frame, and sub-Groupof-Pictures (GoP) level by considering various attributes of the videos.…”
Section: Related Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several variations of the MDC concept have been offered in the research literature [38] and four of the pertinent implementations are Sub-Sample, Quantisation, Transform and Forward Error Correction. We will primarily focus on Forward Error Correction (FEC) [39] as it provides a means of dynamic adaptive stream encoding, low computational complexity, the large quantity of descriptions necessary for the substantial numbers of heterogeneous media streaming devices indicated for future deployment, and it has attracted considerable attention in the literature [40][41][42][43]. Ref.…”
Section: Description-based Streaming Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%