2020
DOI: 10.1111/sji.12951
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Adaptor proteins: Flexible and dynamic modulators of immune cell signalling

Abstract: This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
18
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 263 publications
(490 reference statements)
0
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A simple definition is that adaptor proteins "facilitate signal transduction through interactions with other proteins" (Borowicz et al 2020;Langeberg and Scott 2015). Such a function was shown for Slam through the necessity for the recruitment and the verification of direct binding of RhoGEF2, a regulator of the Rho-Rok pathway (Wenzl et al 2010) Adaptor proteins facilitate the right localization of their binders and to fulfil that task they need certain qualities (Borowicz et al 2020;Langeberg and Scott 2015): binding domains, binding motifs and structural flexibility. A PDZ-binding motif and an SH3-binding motif have been identified for the recruitment of (at least) RhoGEF2 (PDZ), Patj (PDZ) and Cindr (SH3).…”
Section: Slam As Adaptormentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…A simple definition is that adaptor proteins "facilitate signal transduction through interactions with other proteins" (Borowicz et al 2020;Langeberg and Scott 2015). Such a function was shown for Slam through the necessity for the recruitment and the verification of direct binding of RhoGEF2, a regulator of the Rho-Rok pathway (Wenzl et al 2010) Adaptor proteins facilitate the right localization of their binders and to fulfil that task they need certain qualities (Borowicz et al 2020;Langeberg and Scott 2015): binding domains, binding motifs and structural flexibility. A PDZ-binding motif and an SH3-binding motif have been identified for the recruitment of (at least) RhoGEF2 (PDZ), Patj (PDZ) and Cindr (SH3).…”
Section: Slam As Adaptormentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The high intrinsic disorder suggests a great structural flexibility of Slam protein, a feature which is highly relevant for adaptors. This is (among other things) because they can easily be post-translationally modified, the disorder enables flexible links between structured domain and binding sites, it makes dynamic structure changes possible, it increases the hydrodynamic radius of the protein and promotes oligomerization (Borowicz et al 2020;Iakoucheva 2004;Houtman et al 2006;Hofmann et al 2012;Cortese, Uversky, and Keith Dunker 2008).…”
Section: Slam As Adaptormentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…SLP65 [112] and SLP75 [113] are crucial signaling proteins involved in BCR and TCR signal transduction, respectively. In principle, signaling is achieved by complex protein networks [114], however BCR and TCR signaling are now seen in the light of phase separation [115]. Phase separation of adapter proteins in immune cells has been demonstrated in T cells [46,53,87] and in B cells [116].…”
Section: The Need For Simulationsmentioning
confidence: 99%