2016
DOI: 10.1127/metz/2016/0701
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Added value of high-resolution regional climate simulations for regional impact studies

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
20
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…). A standard resolution for present‐day and future RCMs is 10–25 km, and is increased to 1–3 km for specific applications . For paleoclimate applications, the spatial resolution has usually been limited to about 50 km due to the demand of longer simulation periods, requiring a high amount of computational resources.…”
Section: Models and Boundary Conditionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…). A standard resolution for present‐day and future RCMs is 10–25 km, and is increased to 1–3 km for specific applications . For paleoclimate applications, the spatial resolution has usually been limited to about 50 km due to the demand of longer simulation periods, requiring a high amount of computational resources.…”
Section: Models and Boundary Conditionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A standard resolution for present-day and future RCMs is 10-25 km, 22 and is increased to 1-3 km for specific applications. [33][34][35][36][37] For paleoclimate applications, the spatial resolution has usually been limited to about 50 km due to the demand of longer simulation periods, requiring a high amount of computational resources. Nevertheless, a spatial resolution of this order of magnitude is still more suitable for simulating precipitation extremes and the hydroclimate compared to global models.…”
Section: Models and Boundary Conditionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Dynamical downscaling techniques can be helpful to test climate sensitivity and feedback mechanisms on the regional scale and have been widely used for recent, present, and future climate projections [e.g., Giorgi and Gutowski, 2015;Jacob et al, 2014]. Regional climate models (RCMs) can both add value to [Feser et al, 2011;Hackenbruch et al, 2016] and reduce the biases in the GCM simulations [Diaconescu and Laprise, 2013], as the higher resolution permits a better representation of relevant physical processes for regional weather and climate. So far, RCMs have only been scarcely used for past climate simulations in Europe, e.g., for the Common Era [e.g., Gomez-Navarro et al, 2015;Raible et al, 2017], the Younger Dryas [Renssen et al, 2001], and the LGM [Strandberg et al, 2011].…”
Section: Research Lettermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While many of these obstacles are not climate-specific and may emerge in other fields as well, Biesbroek et al [11] identify below, and require climatological input data at spatial and temporal resolutions not yet available in current standard climate simulations. Nevertheless, the scale gap between regional climate models and local impact models has closed considerably [27]. Furthermore, simulation of longer time periods, and generation of ensembles of regional climate model projections based on different global climate model driving data or different emission scenarios are now possible [28][29][30][31][32][33].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%