composed of both electron donor (D) and acceptor (A), finally, transformed to bulk-heterojunction (BHJ) cells formed between D and A, and BHJ structures were further optimized by introducing additional charge-transporting and/or interfacial layers. [27-29] The objectives of the above modifications in device structure are the same: charges can be generated and extracted more efficiently via appropriate spatial alignment of functional components. Currently, BHJ structure is still the dominant configuration for OPV devices, because it can create sufficient D/A interfaces for charge separation, but exist the risk of obvious charge recombination. [30-36] Since charges are transported and collected in vertical direction within OPV devices, forming a preferred vertical phase distribution to some extent, like donor-enrichment at the anode and acceptor-enrichment at the cathode, is a more ideal morphology to reduce the charge recombination and promote the charge collection efficiencies. [37-39] However, it's a tough task for BHJ structure to form well vertical phase distribution. Especially for non-fullerene acceptor-based OPVs, due to the high similarity in chemical structures between donors and nonfullerene acceptors, it will make thermodynamically D and A mix too well. [40] Therefore, it's a tough challenge for fullerenefree OPVs to realize the desirable vertical phase distribution. To achieve the vertical phase distribution, researchers have developed layer-by-layer (LbL) processing method by sequential depositing D and A layers, so as to form a p-in like morphology. [41-45] There are mainly two ways to construct p-in like morphology: 1) sequentially dissolving and processing D and A components in orthogonal solvents; [46] 2) adopting the blade-coating film-forming technology. [47] Due to the similarity of conjugated backbones and side chains of donors and acceptors, it is challenging to find a pair of orthogonal solvents applicable to various donors and acceptors. However, in most labs, spin-coating is still the most common film processing method, which possesses particular advantages in tuning the BHJ morphology due to the larger shear stress. Thereafter, LbL-type OPVs are less studied and their efficiencies are also largely lagging behind those of BHJ-type counterparts. [48] However, LbL-type OPVs might be more suitable for large-area or roll-to-roll fabrications, because they can offer precise control over the morphology of each layer in mass production. [49-51] Obtaining a finely tuned morphology of the active layer to facilitate both charge generation and charge extraction has long been the goal in the field of organic photovoltaics (OPVs). Here, a solution to resolve the above challenge via synergistically combining the layer-by-layer (LbL) procedure and the ternary strategy is proposed and demonstrated. By adding an asymmetric electron acceptor, BTP-S2, with lower miscibility to the binary donor:acceptor host of PM6:BO-4Cl, vertical phase distribution can be formed with donor-enrichment at the anode and accept...