2020
DOI: 10.1021/acsenergylett.0c01364
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Adding a Third Component with Reduced Miscibility and Higher LUMO Level Enables Efficient Ternary Organic Solar Cells

Abstract: It is widely known that the miscibility between donor and acceptor is a crucial factor that affects the morphology and thus device performance of nonfullerene organic solar cells (OSCs). In this Letter, we show that incorporating a third component with lower miscibility and higher lowest unoccupied molecular orbital (LUMO) level into the stateof-the-art PM6:Y6 system can significantly enhance the performance of devices. The best results of the ternary devices are achieved by adding a small molecular acceptor n… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

5
116
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

4
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 205 publications
(121 citation statements)
references
References 66 publications
5
116
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Comparing PM6: Y6 and PM6:Y6: ITIC‐Th blends, the increased acceptor domain size in the latter blend potentially favors electron transport, and can partially account for the increased electron mobilities from 3.96 × 10 −4 to 4.54 × 10 −4 cm 2 V −1 second −1 . Besides, it is understandable that PM6:Y6: IT‐4F exhibited the higher electron mobilities than the PM6: Y6 control, which is attributed to the increased CCL of oop π ‐ π peak and the decreased electron energy disorder 73‐75 . All the blend films exhibited reasonable phase segregation scales with acceptor domain size around 20 nm, except for the PM6: ITIC‐Th blend with an acceptor domain size of approximately 49.3 nm.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Comparing PM6: Y6 and PM6:Y6: ITIC‐Th blends, the increased acceptor domain size in the latter blend potentially favors electron transport, and can partially account for the increased electron mobilities from 3.96 × 10 −4 to 4.54 × 10 −4 cm 2 V −1 second −1 . Besides, it is understandable that PM6:Y6: IT‐4F exhibited the higher electron mobilities than the PM6: Y6 control, which is attributed to the increased CCL of oop π ‐ π peak and the decreased electron energy disorder 73‐75 . All the blend films exhibited reasonable phase segregation scales with acceptor domain size around 20 nm, except for the PM6: ITIC‐Th blend with an acceptor domain size of approximately 49.3 nm.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…According to the surface energy of neat films, the interfacial energy between two different materials in the blend films can be evaluated using the following equation. [ 58,59 ] γAB=γnormalA+γnormalB4γnormalAnormaldγnormalBnormaldγnormalAnormald+γnormalBnormald4γnormalAnormalpγnormalBnormalpγnormalAnormalp+γnormalBnormalp…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[ 52 ] The miscibility between the donor and acceptor can be quantized by the Flory–Huggins interaction parameter χ D–A . [ 56,57 ] The larger χ D–A is, the worse the miscibility is, vise versa. To calculate χ D–A , we performed the contact angle tests on water and diiodomethane, and the results are shown in Figure .…”
Section: Figurementioning
confidence: 99%