2013 4th International Workshop on Software Engineering for Sensor Network Applications (SESENA) 2013
DOI: 10.1109/sesena.2013.6612261
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Adding value to WSN simulation through formal modelling and analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
3
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This problem is highlighted by Kirwan et al (2013), as they crafted a simulator (in MATLAB) and a formal model (in Promela for the SPIN model checker) of their robot’s software (an autonomous navigation closed-loop system) independently to overcome the limitations of simulations and model checking and gain confidence in their results. Intana et al (2013) combined the advantages of simulation and formal verification for wireless sensor networks. Simulations in an environment called MiXiM allowed functional issues to be discovered in a high-fidelity model, whereas formal verification in Event-B was used to provide proofs of requirement satisfaction or violation to strengthen the discoveries during simulation.…”
Section: Comparison With Other Approachesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This problem is highlighted by Kirwan et al (2013), as they crafted a simulator (in MATLAB) and a formal model (in Promela for the SPIN model checker) of their robot’s software (an autonomous navigation closed-loop system) independently to overcome the limitations of simulations and model checking and gain confidence in their results. Intana et al (2013) combined the advantages of simulation and formal verification for wireless sensor networks. Simulations in an environment called MiXiM allowed functional issues to be discovered in a high-fidelity model, whereas formal verification in Event-B was used to provide proofs of requirement satisfaction or violation to strengthen the discoveries during simulation.…”
Section: Comparison With Other Approachesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Simulations in an environment called MiXiM allowed functional issues to be discovered in a high-fidelity model, whereas formal verification in Event-B was used to provide proofs of requirement satisfaction or violation to strengthen the discoveries during simulation. Intana et al (2013) do not consider a course of action if the results from simulation contradict those from formal verification, as is done in the corroborative V&V approach presented in this paper.…”
Section: Comparison With Other Approachesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the end, many researchers consider that empirically analyzing the performances of their contributions would require far too much time, when compared to the potential gains they can expect. In this paper, we aim at demonstrating that these assumptions are groundless, and that experimental analysis can be easily conducted and add significant values to simulation results, as it has recently been done for formal analysis [7].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Com o desenvolvimento e melhoria contínua dos trabalhos da IETF, a validação de novos protocolos em redes de sensores sem fio tem se beneficiado por meio de uso de simuladores computacionais, que proporcionam um ambiente adequado para realização de testes e verificação de limites, os quais podem influenciar de maneira significativa a elaboração de uma nova arquitetura de comunicação (INTANA et al, 2013).…”
Section: Plataformas De Simulação Para Redes De Sensores Sem Fiounclassified