2019
DOI: 10.1177/0885328219859991
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Addition of 2-deoxy-d-ribose to clinically used alginate dressings stimulates angiogenesis and accelerates wound healing in diabetic rats

Abstract: Following recent work from our group on a small ribose-derived sugar 2-deoxy-d-ribose which stimulates angiogenesis in a chick chorionic allantoic membrane bioassay and in skin wounds in healthy rats, we tested the effect of this sugar when added to a common alginate wound dressing in a well-accepted diabetic skin wound model in rats. Dressings were simply loaded with filter-sterilized sugar solutions that were proved stable at room temperature for at least two weeks. Prior to undertaking the animal study, we … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
23
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
0
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…2dDR is a promising pro-angiogenic alternative which has been reported to have chemotactic and angiogenic activity by our group and other researchers using a range of current angiogenic assays: Boyden chamber assay (Uchimiya et al, 2002), tube formation assay (Uchimiya et al, 2002), CAM assay (Haraguchi et al, 1994;Dikici et al, 2019b), and rat wound healing models (Yar et al, 2017;Azam et al, 2019). However, the dose-dependent response to 2dDR still remains to be investigated in vitro to determine what is the effective concentration range to drive angiogenesis at the cellular level.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…2dDR is a promising pro-angiogenic alternative which has been reported to have chemotactic and angiogenic activity by our group and other researchers using a range of current angiogenic assays: Boyden chamber assay (Uchimiya et al, 2002), tube formation assay (Uchimiya et al, 2002), CAM assay (Haraguchi et al, 1994;Dikici et al, 2019b), and rat wound healing models (Yar et al, 2017;Azam et al, 2019). However, the dose-dependent response to 2dDR still remains to be investigated in vitro to determine what is the effective concentration range to drive angiogenesis at the cellular level.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2dDR has previously demonstrated to have chemotactic and angiogenic activity in vivo (Haraguchi et al, 1994;Matsushita et al, 1999). Similarly, our group recently demonstrated the angiogenic potential of 2-deoxy-D-ribose (2dDR) using an ex-ovo CAM assay (Dikici et al, 2019b) and a diabetic rat model (Azam et al, 2019). Several groups evaluated the angiogenic activity of 2dDR in vitro but only using a narrow range of concentrations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Wound closure (%) was calculated on days 3, 7, 14, 21, and 27 after implantation of the mats, using a given formula 23 by using image J software (Image J version 1.52a). For this purpose, high resolution images of wounds of all rats were captured at a uniform magnification.…”
Section: Assessment Of Wound Closure (%)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These materials increase the cost of surgery and have unreliable effects in the prevention of adhesions 2 , 6 . Several other substances with different mechanisms of action, such as cow peritoneum, amniotic membranes or liquids, oxidized celluloses, olive oil, soybean oil, starch, glycerol, honey, diluted glucose, corticosteroids, and many others have been tried to prevent the formation of postoperative peritoneal adhesion 2 , 6 8 , 12 , 13 , 22 , 25 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%