2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2007.08.025
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Additional sampling based on regulation threshold and kriging variance to reduce the probability of false delineation in a contaminated site

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These IR and PXRF measurements can be a part of an adaptive sampling design whereby sampling efforts are directed to areas where the degree of contamination appears to be higher (Juang et al, 2005(Juang et al, , 2008. This adaptive sampling strategy is somewhat similar to what was proposed by Englund and Heravi (1994).…”
Section: Sampling For Contamination Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…These IR and PXRF measurements can be a part of an adaptive sampling design whereby sampling efforts are directed to areas where the degree of contamination appears to be higher (Juang et al, 2005(Juang et al, , 2008. This adaptive sampling strategy is somewhat similar to what was proposed by Englund and Heravi (1994).…”
Section: Sampling For Contamination Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…This uncertainty can be expressed in terms of the kriging variance σ 2 (x). Juang et al [8] and van Meirvenne and Goovaerts [2] considered how the proximity of predictions to the threshold could be incorporated into a design algorithm. They suggested that the most beneficial locations to make additional observations are where | z(x) − z c |/σ is small.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is limited information concerning phytoextraction efficiency under conditions of toxic stress on plant growth. Generally, there is high spatial variation of heavy metals in a contaminated site (Juang et al 2008); in highly contaminated areas, the plant may accumulate more of a heavy metal, resulting in a significant reduction of biomass due to toxicity (Deram et al 2006). Thus, phytoextraction of heavy metals should involve a compromise between the accumulation of a heavy metal and biomass reduction due to phytotoxicity.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%