2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.theriogenology.2011.05.040
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Additional value of computer assisted semen analysis (CASA) compared to conventional motility assessments in pig artificial insemination

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
55
1
3

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 70 publications
(60 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
1
55
1
3
Order By: Relevance
“…When the traditional subjective visual evaluation system was used to assess sperm motility and the results were compared to fertility, a contradictory relationship was found between them (Andersson et al, 1992;Marshburn et al, 1992;Zhang et al, 1998;Januskauskas et al, 1999). Several studies demon- strated that the traditional microscopic visual technique for the determination of motile sperm ratio is inaccurate, imprecise and its repeatability is very low (Gunzel-Apel et al, 1993;Centola, 1996;Coetzee et al, 1999;Larsen et al, 2000;Broekhuijse et al, 2011). There is a lack of evidence-based information about the relationship between motility/velocity characteristics and the fertilising ability of bull spermatozoa; therefore, it is unknown whether sperm fertility could really be predicted by these parameters.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When the traditional subjective visual evaluation system was used to assess sperm motility and the results were compared to fertility, a contradictory relationship was found between them (Andersson et al, 1992;Marshburn et al, 1992;Zhang et al, 1998;Januskauskas et al, 1999). Several studies demon- strated that the traditional microscopic visual technique for the determination of motile sperm ratio is inaccurate, imprecise and its repeatability is very low (Gunzel-Apel et al, 1993;Centola, 1996;Coetzee et al, 1999;Larsen et al, 2000;Broekhuijse et al, 2011). There is a lack of evidence-based information about the relationship between motility/velocity characteristics and the fertilising ability of bull spermatozoa; therefore, it is unknown whether sperm fertility could really be predicted by these parameters.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, two more recent studies by Broekhuijse et al (2011;2012) showed that progressive motility, VCL and BCF were positively related with farrowing rate, while total motility, VAP, VSL and ALH were positively related to the total number of born piglets. Holt et al (1997) also reported that the VSL was positively related to the litter size.…”
Section: Boar Semenmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…Previous studies focusing on the effects of the above-mentioned substances differ in their conclusions as well as in their methodological approaches. But the method of motility assessment may significantly influence obtained results (Broekhuijse et al 2011). We applied objective motility evaluation by means of computer-assisted sperm analysis (CASA), using the cluster analysis method, which is suitable for resolving heterogeneity of the sperm motility data in discrete subpopulations (MartinezPastor et al 2011).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%