2006
DOI: 10.1007/11848035_15
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Additive vs. Image Dependent DWT-DCT Based Watermarking

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 5 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Fotopoulos and Skodras [12] decompose the original image into four bands using the Haar wavelet, and then perform DCT on each of the bands; the watermark is embedded into the DCT coefficients of each band. Serkan Emek and Melih Pazarci [13] compared image dependent and additive blind watermarking algorithms that embed a watermark in the DWT-DCT domain by taking the properties of the HVS into account [14]. The image dependent algorithm modulates the watermarking coefficients with original mid-frequency DWT-DCT coefficients [15].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fotopoulos and Skodras [12] decompose the original image into four bands using the Haar wavelet, and then perform DCT on each of the bands; the watermark is embedded into the DCT coefficients of each band. Serkan Emek and Melih Pazarci [13] compared image dependent and additive blind watermarking algorithms that embed a watermark in the DWT-DCT domain by taking the properties of the HVS into account [14]. The image dependent algorithm modulates the watermarking coefficients with original mid-frequency DWT-DCT coefficients [15].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%