2018
DOI: 10.1126/sciadv.aaq1459
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Addressable electron spin resonance using donors and donor molecules in silicon

Abstract: Built-in hyperfine couplings of donor qubits engineered by precision placement promote addressable electron spin resonance.

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

4
62
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(66 citation statements)
references
References 54 publications
4
62
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Figure 6A shows example noise PSDs of the frequency shift δω e ( t ) caused by Overhauser fields, each calculated for five different values of T wait for one isotopic configuration. With frequent electron interactions (short T wait ), the spectrum approaches a 1/ω 2 power law; in this case, the noise is dominated by a Brownian random walk due to “ionization shock” ( 31 , 34 ), i.e., the sudden reconfiguration in effective magnetic field seen by each nuclear spin due to the diabatic appearance or disappearance of the neutralizing electron. The forcible removal of the hyperfine-coupled electron is unique to our experiment; however, similar “sudden shock” effects occur also in conventional pulsed-electron paramagnetic resonance, when a fast rotation of the electron spin causes a sudden reorientation of the hyperfine field on the nearby nuclei ( 35 ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Figure 6A shows example noise PSDs of the frequency shift δω e ( t ) caused by Overhauser fields, each calculated for five different values of T wait for one isotopic configuration. With frequent electron interactions (short T wait ), the spectrum approaches a 1/ω 2 power law; in this case, the noise is dominated by a Brownian random walk due to “ionization shock” ( 31 , 34 ), i.e., the sudden reconfiguration in effective magnetic field seen by each nuclear spin due to the diabatic appearance or disappearance of the neutralizing electron. The forcible removal of the hyperfine-coupled electron is unique to our experiment; however, similar “sudden shock” effects occur also in conventional pulsed-electron paramagnetic resonance, when a fast rotation of the electron spin causes a sudden reorientation of the hyperfine field on the nearby nuclei ( 35 ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is a two level system that can be used as a qubit and we name it spin-1/2 qubit to distinguish it from other types of spin qubits. To manipulate this type of qubit, microwave (MW) bursts via an antenna were used to generate oscillating magnetic field [30,31], as illustrated in Fig.1 (f) and (h). This approach is called electron spin resonance (ESR) for controlling electron spins or nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) for controlling nuclear spins.…”
Section: Spin-1/2 Qubitmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(e), (f) and (g) are images and schematics for the device fabricated by STM hydrogen lithography (Adapted from ref. [30]).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This approach assumes the use of hydrogen monolayer as a resist, which can be easily removed with an STM tip [1][2][3][4] . Recently, the hydrogen depassivation lithography has evolved into a wellestablished technique applied with success to the creation of a single atom transistor 5 and elements of the quantum computer 6,7 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%