Addressing Educational Needs in Managing Complex Pain in Cancer Populations: Evaluation of APAM: An Online Educational Intervention for Nurses

Abstract

Context: Cancer-related pain is associated with significant suffering and is one of the most challenging symptoms to manage. Studies indicate that front-line clinicians often lack the knowledge on best practices in cancer pain management. Objectives: The current project, a quality improvement (QI) initiative, evaluated the outcome of an online educational intervention for nurses on complex cancer pain management. Methods: An online 7-module educational intervention, Advanced Pain Assessment and Management, was offered from 2012 to 2017. Pre-post course evaluations included self-reported knowledge and confidence across cancer pain management domains. In-course competency assessments included knowledge examination, online discussion forum participation, opioid dosage calculation assignment, and small-group-based case study. A mixed-model statistical analysis was used to assess pre-post course change in pain management confidence level. Results: In all, 306 nurses from 89 hospitals in Ontario, Canada, were enrolled in the course; 81.4% returned the precourse survey and 71.9% successfully completed the course. The average confidence level on pain management was low at baseline (57.5%) but improved significantly post-course. Incourse competency assessments ranged from 81% to 89%. Mixed-model results showed post-course improvements in confidence levels, independent of sociodemographic background, clinical role, and professional educational level. Nurses with longer years of practice and more cancer cases reported greater confidence. Conclusion: A facilitator-led online educational intervention focusing on complex cancer pain management can significantly improve nurses' knowledge, confidence, and skills. Low baseline knowledge among nurses highlights the pressing need for health-care organizations to implement cancer pain management training as an integral part of health-care QI initiative.

How to Evaluate Online Education for General Practitioners: Development of a Tailored Questionnaire for Heart Failure Education

“… 25 Leung et al used mixed methods modeling. 26 None conducted item or factor analysis of their questionnaire to assess the discriminating value of items, their match with a hypothesized underlying construct or mapping onto meaningful factors. In our study, for example, this was particularly useful since we saw that our question items did not map clearly to our first list of 6 hypothesized factors, but rather to 3 different ones.…”

Assessing the effectiveness of a digital, case-based learning platform for cancer pain management in residency training

“…21 For cancer pain education, Leung YW and colleagues showed that a facilitator-led online educational intervention can significantly enhance not only knowledge and confidence but also clinical skills in nurses. 22 Three components of our e-learning modules could explain our successful outcomes, including 1) an appropriate learning technique (e-CBL) and material that included wellselected cases and teaching materials, 2) appropriate active tools to increase student engagement such as quizzes in each module, and 3) the flexibility of e-learning that allowed students to learn at their own pace and at convenient times.…”

“… 21 For cancer pain education, Leung YW and colleagues showed that a facilitator-led online educational intervention can significantly enhance not only knowledge and confidence but also clinical skills in nurses. 22 …”

Recursos para a capacitação de enfermeiros no formato online: revisão integrativa

“…Estes serviram como base para promover reflexões e o pensamento crítico, conforme apresentado nos estudos A2, A3, A4, A5, A7 e A8. Ressalta-se que o uso de simulações virtuais permite ao cursista aproximar-se de cenários mais próximos da realidade, e consequentemente, propicia uma participação ativa no desenvolvimento de competências e de raciocínio para as tomadas de decisão (Leung, et al, 2019;Magalhães, Chaves & Queiroz, 2018;Tomazini, et al, 2018;Melo, Enders & Basto, 2018).…”