2004
DOI: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2004.08.015
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Adenocarcinoma of the gastric cardia: What is the optimal surgical approach?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

11
108
2
1

Year Published

2008
2008
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 136 publications
(122 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
11
108
2
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Surgical margins were significantly greater by esophageal resection than by extended gastrectomy, which in turn resulted in better survival times [35]. Also, other authors suggest a resection margin of 5-8 cm in situ as a safe surgical margin [39,42]. The survival benefit of TAE in our patients' cohort can possibly be the result of this greater surgical margin after TAE also if the rate of R0 resections did not differ between the two groups.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 49%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Surgical margins were significantly greater by esophageal resection than by extended gastrectomy, which in turn resulted in better survival times [35]. Also, other authors suggest a resection margin of 5-8 cm in situ as a safe surgical margin [39,42]. The survival benefit of TAE in our patients' cohort can possibly be the result of this greater surgical margin after TAE also if the rate of R0 resections did not differ between the two groups.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 49%
“…Despite multiple studies [8,[35][36][37][38][39][40], the discussion is still ongoing whether the "true" carcinoma of the cardia should be resected in accordance to a carcinoma of the esophagus or stomach. Most of the studies are of a heterogeneous design, summarizing different surgical approaches under esophagectomy and gastrectomy and including not only AEG II but AEG I-III.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Indeed, an esophagectomy is required in this case, but gastric tubulization could hinder the attainment of a safe distal margin. In the aforementioned study by Ito, a negative distal margin was found in all patients, with at least 4 cm of macroscopically free stomach below the tumor, while a 5-cm in vivo distal margin was advocated in a study from the UK [45,47].…”
Section: Resection Marginsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As regards the proximal margin, in 2003 Mariette published a study on Siewert type I and II tumors and proposed an 8-cm in situ margin, considering a shrinkage of 50%, thus doubling all the fresh contracted gross specimen measures [44]. Ito et al defined a proximal margin length of 6 cm as safe, whilst in 2007 Barbour observed improved survival with an in vivo proximal margin of about 5 cm (3.8 cm in the specimen) [45,46].…”
Section: Resection Marginsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The treatment of gastric tumors depends on the histology type and it is based on the wide surgical resection of the tumor and lymphadenectomy in case of the adenocarcinoma [19,20], antibiotics, chemotherapy, and surgery in selected cases of gastric lymphoma [21], and in limited resection, without lymphadenectomy, accompanied by chemotherapy in stromal tumors (GIST) [22]. In this context, the preoperative recognition of the type of the disease is extremely important for the implementation of an optimal treatment.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%