2017
DOI: 10.1080/00218464.2016.1265947
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Adhesion between oppositely charged polyelectrolytes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
26
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

3
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
0
26
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The work of adhesion, Wadh, is very large and reflects the large stresses in these systems. 13 It is also likely that some of the gels have undergone plastic deformation, under which circumstances Equation (2) is not an accurate measure of the thermodynamic adhesion.…”
Section: Comparing the Effect Of Salt And Ph Solutionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The work of adhesion, Wadh, is very large and reflects the large stresses in these systems. 13 It is also likely that some of the gels have undergone plastic deformation, under which circumstances Equation (2) is not an accurate measure of the thermodynamic adhesion.…”
Section: Comparing the Effect Of Salt And Ph Solutionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…12 Nevertheless, when one of the components is not a polyelectrolyte, hydrogen bonding can be the determining parameter in pH-controlled switchable adhesion. 6 In the case of the oppositely charged polyelectrolytes, the adhesion typically fails cohesively in water, 13 limiting the scope for reuse of the couple. Strengthening the PMAA hydrogel with poly[oligo(ethylene glycol)methyl ether methacrylate] (POEGMA) to form a double-network hydrogel improved the repeatability of the adhesion, so that the couple could be mechanically detached and reattached in water.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In turn, the covalent or non-covalent bonds formed at the interface will then be subjected to the ability of the PE material itself to remain strong (cohesion) as the interface bond to achieve stability of the bioadhesive whilst adapting to the external environmental conditions [ 115 , 116 ]. The adhesion interactions can thereby be interpreted by the thermodynamic work of adhesion, derived from the Johnson–Kendall–Roberts behaviour, as discussed in previous studies [ 117 , 118 ]. Briefly, one can determine the work of adhesion for bioadhesive PE gels from the relationship between the maximum force required to break a bond (interface or internal) and the size of the gel.…”
Section: Fabrication Of Different Types Of Pe Gelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, investigation of counterion condensation at different pH levels resulted in different adhesion strengths between both the brush and gel when the constituents were swapped around. The changes were suggested to occur due to the brush’s grafting density, which is associated with thickness, resulting in an increase in the electrostatic energy of the counterions [ 118 ]. Comparatively, the presence of weak cations compared to stronger cations was significantly affected by pH conditions.…”
Section: Fabrication Of Different Types Of Pe Gelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The thickness of the brush is found to have a significant effect. [92] When considering extreme conditions of boundary lubrication, both pressure and shear are significant. Ideally, studies under shear would also be in-situ due to the non-equilibrium nature of these conditions.…”
Section: Extreme Conditionsmentioning
confidence: 99%